Yes - agreed. Luis and I had done several bug scrubs earlier in the release where we had looked at and closed many bugs which were no longer valid (especially from the Hydrogen days, etc.). We can remove many more of these by scrubbing further (including the list you sent) and as you say close many of them - we can add new bugs if needed.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Abhijit, guys > > > > As I said yesterday (02/08/2016) on meeting I went trough bugzilla and > tried to make some light into 'historical bugs' > > > There are many bug maybe solved and untested (or tested but not closed), > maybe unsolvable at all. I was wondering there are still bug from 2013-2014 > not closed nor tested. > > > If there are some bugs they are *solved, merged and not tested* but still > opened *we should close them and in case if they appear again we should > write them as new bug.* It is really chaos there for a newcomer and at > this point of view it seems that the community isn’t working on old bugs at > all. I assume that many people aren't working or helping on OFP anymore so > its on us to maintain the bugzilla, to make for all people the start/help > as easy as possible. Maybe is it not so terrible as I see it, but it’s the > first look ... (*I am talking about very old bugs, no response for like 3 > months or more*). > > > *The list of probably solved but not closed* * bugs*: (not tested or > reporter doesn’t response at all) > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1509 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2612 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2774 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2929 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2930 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2985 - documentation should > be update on wiki ? > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3163 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3515 - in state waiting for > review, but no link to gerrit > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4148 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4270 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4377 > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4677 - need to be reviewed, > re-based ? > > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4757 > > > - And there comes out a question, who can close/reopen the bugs ? Only > commiters ? > > - For the old opened bugs would be nice to have in the bug message if > its either Li or He design, if the reporter knows > > > *P.S.: Creating another list: unsolved / unconfirmed bugs with no response > from reporter or assignee ...* > > > Jozef Bacigal > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
