I am available for this. > On Feb 18, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hideyuki, > > Thanks for bringing this topic up! I was planning to initiate a conversation > on this later today - since the Beryllium release was officially approved > today. First of all - I think we should dedicate a TWS session for this topic > regarding the following discussion and feedback: > > 1. OpenFlow plugin project voted to do the following: > OF Plugin recommends dependent ODL projects to all move to Li plugin design > in the Be SR 1 timeframe > (https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowplugin-dev/2016-February/004607.html > > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowplugin-dev/2016-February/004607.html> > ) > 2. What do projects see as issues & impediments to move to the Lithium design > in the SRs (target SR 1) and how the OpenFlow plugin project can address > them? Example of the issues - your request regarding the stats RPCs. > 3. Develop a timeframe for completing this migration based on the > issues/impediments. > I would like to note that the key requirement from OpenFlow plugin > perspective is that the Boron development should not be done on two different > designs. The timeframe should be based on this requirement. Hence OFP thinks > it will be important to do this change in the SR1 (or SR2 if cannot be > managed). This way OFP developers can concentrate on the Lithium design > during the Boron release timeframe (other than occasional high priority bug > fixes on Helium design in the subsequent SRs). However, we (OFP & dependent > projects) will need to work together for this timeframe. > > I will try to get this topic on the TWS call on Monday (assuming we can get > the following folks from OFP on Monday (alphabetical order) - Anil Vishnoi, > Jozef Bazigal, Kamal Rameshan, Michal Rehak & hopefully Muthu/Shuva & Luis. > > I think the above answers all of your questions except one: > Do you plan to continuously support the OFP-He of Beryllium until > OpenDaylight project stops to support Beryllium? > > The answer to that is - yes. OpenFlow Plugin has to support OFP-He in > Beryllium - as per ODL release / deprecation requirements. > > Thanks, > Abhijit > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Tai, Hideyuki <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi OpenFlow Plugin project, > > Could you share your plan about the migration to the OFP-Li in Beryllium SRs? > Should all projects migrate to the OFP-Li by Beryllium SR1? > Do you plan to continuously support the OFP-He of Beryllium until > OpenDaylight project stops to support Beryllium? > (In my understanding, OpenDaylight project officially stops to support > Beryllium (4th) after it releases Carbon (6th).) > > If we need to migrate to the OFP-Li by Beryllium SR1, I would like to start > to test VTN project's features with the OFP-Li as soon as possible. > Though, to migrate the VTN features from OFP-He to OFP-Li, we need the > "get-stats-.." RPC by default in the OFP-Li as I explained in the following > mail. > https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/vtn-dev/2016-February/001278.html > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/vtn-dev/2016-February/001278.html> > > Regards, > Hideyuki Tai > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev> > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
