Yeah. I'm just basically looking for some single place where we can record
all of the relevant projects and their vote of "go", or "here are my bugs".

--Colin


On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I am suggesting bugzilla bugs with the titles starting with the string
> "Li Migration: " - which will make it easy to track issues.
>
> We have the OpenFlow Plugin tracking tab in the google spreadsheet for the
> migration during the Beryllium release:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=556767095
>
> We need to move that tab to the Boron spreadsheet.
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Do we have any place we're tracking all the projects and logged message
>> about them either having issues or no issues?
>>
>> --Colin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Since in today's TWS there were not many project leads and committers of
>>> the dependent projects attending - the action item for me was to send an
>>> email summarizing the plan for migration and send it to release & discuss.
>>>
>>> So I would like to provide (repeat) the rough plan:
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Have the projects test out the new design and report issues. The
>>>    OpenFlow Plugin release plan would be dependent on that. The already
>>>    extended deadline for this was April 7 so that OFP has inputs to decide
>>>    what major issues need to be addressed - and be incorporated in the
>>>    OpenFlow Plugin release plan (due April 21).
>>>    - The issues should be filed as blocker bugs for OpenFlow Plugin
>>>       with the title starting with the string "Li Migration: ". This will 
>>> make it
>>>       easy to search for the issues in bugzilla.
>>>       - So far we have received reports from VTN (3 issues - 4671, 5432
>>>       & 5602), GBP (no blocking issues reported). In the past L2 switch had
>>>       responded saying they already support the Lithium design natively. 
>>> Need
>>>       reports from the remaining projects & I think we will need to track 
>>> these
>>>       in the Boron spreadsheet.
>>>    2. The OFP target for fixing the issues and actually changing the
>>>    default plugin would likely be dependent offset 2 projects M2 / OpenFlow
>>>    Plugin M3 - depending on the complexity of the issues identified.
>>>       - I have reflected this in the OpenFlow Plugin release plan under
>>>       M3.
>>>
>>>
>>> Again please be aware of this plan and please report the corresponding
>>> issues as soon as possible (deadline April 7). We can discuss the issues in
>>> the next week TWS call.
>>>
>>> I will try to reach out individually to you all the next few days.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Abhijit
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've added it here:
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Tech_Work_Stream:Main#Upcoming_Meeting_Agendas
>>>>
>>>> --Colin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sounds good to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:53 AM, An Ho <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Could we schedule a meeting during TWS for projects affected by
>>>>>> OpenFlowPlugin to meet on 4/4 for dependant projects to share their
>>>>>> feedback or concerns?  Dependant projects should provide feedback either 
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> email or at the meeting.  I will start reaching out to projects to get
>>>>>> representatives to the meeting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An Ho
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:45 AM
>>>>>> *To:* Colin Dixon; An Ho
>>>>>> *Cc:* Release; [email protected];
>>>>>> [email protected];
>>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>>>> [email protected];
>>>>>> [email protected]; <[email protected]>;
>>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [L2switch-dev] Weather report: Unmerged Patch for
>>>>>> projects to test OpenFlow Plugin default design to Lithium
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The OpenFlow Plugin project has not received any reports from you
>>>>>> (the dependent projects) about using this patch to try and test the 
>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>> Have you had a chance to try out the patch? And you have not run into
>>>>>> issues? Or is it that you have not tried it at all? I suspect it is the
>>>>>> latter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In order to get more realistic feedback /identify major issues after
>>>>>> you folks have tried the new plugin & to incorporate that into the 
>>>>>> OpenFlow
>>>>>> Plugin release plan - we can extend the deadline for the feedback by a 
>>>>>> bit
>>>>>> - but not a lot. Working backwards from our M2 date (April 21) when we 
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> to finalize our release plan - my guess is we would need the feedback by 
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> least two weeks before to incorporate any changes/requirements to our
>>>>>> release plan. That would put it to April 7. *Please sure that the
>>>>>> feedback/major issues that you have identified with the Lithium design is
>>>>>> available by April 7.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An - can we have the release IRC meeting next Wednesday the usual
>>>>>> time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Abhijit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. We should also discuss this in the next IRC release meeting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We should probably add this to the milestone readouts for Beryllium.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Colin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, March 11, 2016, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need all the dependent projects of OpenFlow Plugin (OFP) to move
>>>>>> to the Lithium design for the Boron release. To help in this process
>>>>>> OpenFlow Plugin has created an unmerged patch which swaps the default
>>>>>> design to the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​new ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lithium design. The patch is: 
>>>>>> *https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892
>>>>>> <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892>. *The purpose of
>>>>>> this patch is for projects to identify issues in the migration and help
>>>>>> OpenFlow Plugin fix them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To use this patch projects should:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> clone the openflowplugin and then checkout this patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  it locally
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​ and build
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​​
>>>>>>
>>>>>> t
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​est​
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​their project with the locally swapped new plugin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would like this activity to identify issues to conclude in the
>>>>>> next 2 weeks or so (say March 24 - which happens to be the current 
>>>>>> offset 2
>>>>>> projects M1 date in the provisional traditional release plan ). That way
>>>>>> OpenFlow Plugin can factor the gaps needed to fix in the OpenFlow Plugin
>>>>>> release plan which is due by M2 for us (current date in the provisional
>>>>>> traditional release plan for OFP is April 21). The OFP target for fixing
>>>>>> the issues and actually changing the default plugin would likely be 
>>>>>> either
>>>>>> OFP M2 or M3 - depending on the complexity of the issues identified. The
>>>>>> issues which cannot be worked around
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​and blocking development of the project ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>> should be raised as blocker issues on OpenFlow Plugin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again as I mentioned - please try this patch out and let us know the
>>>>>> issues by March 24. If there is an issue in providing this info - please
>>>>>> let us know as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Abhijit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to