Yes - that is what we were discussing on the OpenFlow Plugin IRC. This is
not a blocker since it does not affect the end users - however we can wait
till Wednesday morning (say 10 am Pacific) to get a response/fix from Jozef
(with Michal's help in merging it). Apparently it takes 24 hours for a
respin - 12 hours to build & 12 hours to get approvals from project leads.
If the ETA for the fix in the morning from Jozef pushes the build beyond
the TSC meeting - then we should skip.

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote:

> I agree with this Anil.  Beryllium end users should not be using the Li
> Plugin Design.
>
>
>
> If Jamo, Abhijit, and Jozef agrees with this, then we should mark the
> issue as not a regression blocker and OKAY to release.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> An Ho
>
>
>
> *From:* Anil Vishnoi [mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:48 PM
> *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare
> *Cc:* An Ho; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Li plugin cluster broken
>
>
>
> In my opinion this is not a blocker, given that this plugin is not a
> default plugin for Beryllium release.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I would like to know Jozef's thoughts on this.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:15 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Have we been able to determine if this is a blocker, in the sense that
> some end-user functionality that worked in SR1 no longer works in SR2?
> Also, do have a known workaround for the issue?  Could we release SR2 with
> this known bug and workaround and target a fix in SR3?
>
> Another concern I have is that Beryllium SR2 Build 20160425 did not find
> any regression issues in openflowplugin and we have not merged nay patches
> that impacted openflowplugin in the Beryllium branches.
>
> Best Regards,
> An Ho
>
> From: Abhijit Kumbhare abhijitkoss at gmail.com
> Subject: Tue May 3 15:49:42 UTC 2016
>
>
> Can you share the list of the patches Jozef?
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijit
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > just to confirm that this should not be a blocker for SR2, right?
> >
> > if so, we'll need your patches merged (and associated with a bug) and a
> > respin of
> > SR2.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > JamO
> >
> > On 05/03/2016 01:56 AM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON
> TECHNOLOGIES
> > at Cisco) wrote:
> > > This is happening, occasionally, we solved it already in plugin.
> Patches
> > are ready to be merged we just wait for beryllium to be unlocked.
> > >
> > > Jozef
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: openflowplugin-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> > openflowplugin-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Jamo
> > Luhrsen
> > > Sent: 3. mája 2016 5:57
> > > To: Luis Gomez <ecelgp at gmail.com>; openflowplugin-dev <
> > openflowplugin-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Li plugin cluster broken
> > >
> > > This looks like something that used to happen from time to time.
> Oldest
> > example was back on 4/17.  However, it currently looks like it's
> happening
> > almost every time.  That's a bit worrisome.
> > >
> > > I tried to recreate locally, but could not.
> > >
> > > not sure if that's helpful or not, but wanted to share.
> > >
> > > JamO
> > >
> > > On 05/02/2016 10:19 AM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> It seems Li plugin cluster is broken for few days now. The ERROR is
> > >> 401 Unauthorized answer when polling the NB REST API. This happens
> when
> > controller does not start properly.
> > >>
> > >>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowpl
> > >> ugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boron
> > >>
> > >> _
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowp
> > >> lugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium/_
> > >>
> > >> BR/Luis
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev
> > >> mailing list openflowplugin-dev at lists.opendaylight.org
> > >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> > > openflowplugin-dev at lists.opendaylight.org
> > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> > openflowplugin-dev at lists.opendaylight.org
> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks
>
> Anil
>
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
  • [openflowplug... Luis Gomez
    • Re: [ope... Jamo Luhrsen
      • Re: ... Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
        • ... Jamo Luhrsen
          • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
    • [openflo... An Ho
      • Re: ... Abhijit Kumbhare
        • ... Anil Vishnoi
          • ... An Ho
            • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
              • ... Jamo Luhrsen
                • ... Luis Gomez
                • ... Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
                • ... Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Jamo Luhrsen
                • ... Luis Gomez
                • ... Jamo Luhrsen
                • ... Luis Gomez
                • ... Jamo Luhrsen

Reply via email to