That is the default behavior in Boron right?

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 11:55 PM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> And for scaling out on the number of switches,  can we have table-features 
> turned off ?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Muthukumaran K 
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 12:23 PM
> To: Luis Gomez; Shuva Jyoti Kar
> Cc: openflowplugin-dev; Jin Gan; [email protected]; 
> Sanjib Mohapatra; BUCI DUAC R&D INDIA PDG SDNC XFT6
> Subject: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next 
> ODL perf paper
> 
> With logs set to ERROR it could be almost like persistence-off++ :-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luis 
> Gomez
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 12:15 PM
> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
> Cc: openflowplugin-dev; Jin Gan; [email protected]; 
> Sanjib Mohapatra; BUCI DUAC R&D INDIA PDG SDNC XFT6
> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next 
> ODL perf paper
> 
> Yes, we set up that too in some tests to avoid too many logs.
> 
>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 11:43 PM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Also it would be great if we could the test with the logging in ERROR 
>> mode only
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Luis Gomez [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 12:11 PM
>> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
>> Cc: Sanjib Mohapatra; Abhijit Kumbhare; 
>> [email protected]; openflowplugin-dev; Jin Gan; 
>> BUCI DUAC R&D INDIA PDG SDNC XFT6
>> Subject: Re: [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next ODL perf paper
>> 
>> Marcus has a setup with SSD in Intel Lab that we used for 1st paper and also 
>> plan to use for the second. Disabling persistence is something we can do in 
>> the ODL infra for example.
>> 
>> BR/Luis
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 11:34 PM, Shuva Jyoti Kar 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ahhh....can we have 2 sets - one with SDD and the other with persistence 
>>> off ?
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Luis Gomez [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 12:04 PM
>>> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
>>> Cc: Sanjib Mohapatra; Abhijit Kumbhare; 
>>> [email protected]; openflowplugin-dev; Jin Gan; 
>>> BUCI DUAC R&D INDIA PDG SDNC XFT6
>>> Subject: Re: [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next ODL perf paper
>>> 
>>> Thanks Shuva, we will not use it then.
>>> 
>>> On the other hand, in general for performance test we either use fast disk 
>>> (SSD) or disable the datastore persistence [1] so that controller does not 
>>> need to write into physical HDD every datastore transaction.
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Integration/Distribution/Cluster_S
>>> c
>>> ripts
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Shuva Jyoti Kar 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It was only experimental. There's some level of testing(triggering 
>>>> scenarios like kernel panic)  to be done before actually formalizing it.
>>>> So would not recommend formal testing using it now.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Shuva
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sanjib Mohapatra
>>>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 11:42 AM
>>>> To: Luis Gomez
>>>> Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare; [email protected];
>>>> openflowplugin-dev; Jin Gan; BUCI DUAC R&D INDIA PDG SDNC XFT6
>>>> Subject: RE: [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next ODL perf 
>>>> paper
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Luis
>>>> 
>>>> Got a recommendation from dev to use fsync = off in akka.conf under 
>>>> "odl-cluster-data"
>>>> It was tested at their end and they found performance to be increased 2x.
>>>> 
>>>> persistence {
>>>> journal {
>>>>    leveldb {
>>>>      # Set native = off to use a Java-only implementation of leveldb.
>>>>      # Note that the Java-only version is not currently considered by Akka 
>>>> to be production quality.
>>>> 
>>>>      fsync = off
>>>>    }
>>>>  }
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Sanjib
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Luis Gomez [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: 29 July 2016 02:27
>>>> To: Sanjib Mohapatra
>>>> Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare; [email protected];
>>>> openflowplugin-dev; Jin Gan; BUCI DUAC R&D INDIA PDG SDNC XFT6
>>>> Subject: Re: [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next ODL perf 
>>>> paper
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Sanjib Mohapatra 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Luis
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to have one clarification, By “100K flows on an OF network 
>>>>> of different size: 16-32-64-128 switches”, does it mean same 100K flows 
>>>>> for 16-32-64 switches ?
>>>> 
>>>> The goal is to run the perf test on different OF network sizes so we know 
>>>> what is the impact (if any) of this.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have some local scripts to run 150K-15 DPN, 330K-33DPN etc, I run it 
>>>>> with following configuration optimisation in controller nodes. The DPNs 
>>>>> are equally spread across controller nodes.
>>>> 
>>>> If you increase the number of flows from one network to another, you are 
>>>> running some sort of scalability test mixed with the performance test that 
>>>> can confuse the result, like the perf degradation is because of the number 
>>>> of switches or because the number of flows that has to be stored and 
>>>> programmed… For this reason I would prefer to run the test with the same 
>>>> condition of fix 100K flows divided among the switches that are available 
>>>> in the network. It is also that testing this way we can easily compare one 
>>>> network result to another.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>    I.          fsync = off in akka.conf
>>>> 
>>>> What is this setting?
>>>> 
>>>>>  II.          changing root logging to ERROR from INFO
>>>>> III.          Set JAVA_MIN_MEM=512M JAVA_MAX_MEM=8192M in karaf
>>>>> IV.          <skip-table-features>true</skip-table-features> in 
>>>>> 42-openflowplugin-He.xml
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can rerun those scripts by tweaking it to the current requirement . Do 
>>>>> let me know if any other configuration optimisation is required. Also 
>>>>> could you please provide path to Boron distribution. I ran below scripts 
>>>>> in stable Beryllium.
>>>> 
>>>> Master distribution is in nexus: 
>>>> https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.sna
>>>> p s
>>>> hot/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.5.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>>> 
>>>> Does your test automation provide all the perf numbers required in this 
>>>> TC: controller programming time, switch programming time, and flow 
>>>> confirmation delay? If not, that is the next thing to work on.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> root@mininet-vm:/home/mininet/integration/test/csit/suites/openflow
>>>>> p l u gin/Clustering_Bulkomatic# pybot -L TRACE  -v 
>>>>> MININET_USER:mininet -v USER_HOME:/home/mininet -v
>>>>> CONTROLLER:10.183.181.51 -v
>>>>> CONTROLLER1:10.183.181.52 -v CONTROLLER2:10.183.181.53 -v USER:root 
>>>>> -v PASSWORD:rootroot -v WORKSPACE:/home/mininet -v 
>>>>> BUNDLEFOLDER:/controller-Be/deploy/current/odl -v 
>>>>> DEFAULT_LINUX_PROMPT:\#  -v NUM_ODL_SYSTEM:3 -v 
>>>>> MININET_PASSWORD:rootroot -v 
>>>>> OVS_SWITCH_FILE:Multi_Switch_Medium_Config.py
>>>>> 150K__Cluster_Reconcilliation_Multi_DPN.robot
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> = = = ======== Cluster Reconcilliation Multi DPN :: Test suite for 
>>>>> Cluster with Bulk Flows...
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> = = = ======== Check Shards Status And Initialize Variables :: 
>>>>> Check Status for a... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Get Inventory Follower Before Cluster Restart :: Find a 
>>>>> follower i... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Start Mininet Connect To Follower Node1 :: Start mininet 
>>>>> with conn... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Add Bulk Flow From Follower :: 10000 Flows (10K per DPN) 
>>>>> in
>>>>> 15 DPN... | PASS |
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Verify Flows In Switch :: Verify 150K flows are installed.            | 
>>>>> PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Stop Mininet Connected To Follower Node1 and Exit :: Stop 
>>>>> mininet ... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Delete All Flows From Follower Node1 :: 150000 Flows 
>>>>> deleted via F... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Cluster Reconcilliation Multi DPN :: Test suite for 
>>>>> Cluster with B... | PASS |
>>>>> 7 critical tests, 7 passed, 0 failed
>>>>> 7 tests total, 7 passed, 0 failed
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> ========
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> root@mininet-vm:/home/mininet/integration/test/csit/suites/openflow
>>>>> p l u gin/Clustering_Bulkomatic# pybot -L TRACE  -v 
>>>>> MININET_USER:mininet -v USER_HOME:/home/mininet -v
>>>>> CONTROLLER:10.183.181.51 -v
>>>>> CONTROLLER1:10.183.181.52 -v CONTROLLER2:10.183.181.53 -v USER:root 
>>>>> -v PASSWORD:rootroot -v WORKSPACE:/home/mininet -v 
>>>>> BUNDLEFOLDER:/controller-Be/deploy/current/odl -v 
>>>>> DEFAULT_LINUX_PROMPT:\#  -v NUM_ODL_SYSTEM:3 -v 
>>>>> MININET_PASSWORD:rootroot -v 
>>>>> OVS_SWITCH_FILE:Multi_11Switch_Medium_Config.py
>>>>> 330K__Cluster_Reconcilliation_Multi_DPN.robot
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> = = = ======== Cluster Reconcilliation Multi DPN :: Test suite for 
>>>>> Cluster with Bulk Flows...
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> = = = ======== Check Shards Status And Initialize Variables :: 
>>>>> Check Status for a... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Get Inventory Follower Before Cluster Restart :: Find a 
>>>>> follower i... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Start Mininet Connect To Follower Node1 :: Start mininet 
>>>>> with conn... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Add Bulk Flow From Follower :: 10000 Flows (10K per DPN) 
>>>>> in
>>>>> 33 DPN... | PASS |
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Verify Flows In Switch :: Verify 330K flows are installed.            | 
>>>>> PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Stop Mininet Connected To Follower Node1 and Exit :: Stop 
>>>>> mininet ... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Delete All Flows From Follower Node1 :: 330000 Flows 
>>>>> deleted via F... | PASS |
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -------- Cluster Reconcilliation Multi DPN :: Test suite for 
>>>>> Cluster with B... | PASS |
>>>>> 7 critical tests, 7 passed, 0 failed
>>>>> 7 tests total, 7 passed, 0 failed
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> ========
>>>>> Output:  
>>>>> /home/mininet/integration/test/csit/suites/openflowplugin/Clustering_Bulkomatic/output.xml
>>>>> Log:     
>>>>> /home/mininet/integration/test/csit/suites/openflowplugin/Clustering_Bulkomatic/log.html
>>>>> Report:  
>>>>> /home/mininet/integration/test/csit/suites/openflowplugin/Clusterin
>>>>> g
>>>>> _
>>>>> B
>>>>> ulkomatic/report.html
>>>>> root@mininet-vm:/home/mininet/integration/test/csit/suites/openflow
>>>>> p
>>>>> l
>>>>> u
>>>>> gin/Clustering_Bulkomatic#
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Sanjib
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: Luis Gomez [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: 28 July 2016 05:17
>>>>> To: Abhijit Kumbhare
>>>>> Cc: [email protected]; openflowplugin-dev; Jin 
>>>>> Gan; Sanjib Mohapatra
>>>>> Subject: Re: [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next ODL perf 
>>>>> paper
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Abhijit,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We can definitely leverage any automation your team will prepare to test 
>>>>> all the combinations below, but just to be clear the ODL perf paper we 
>>>>> will only include out-of-the-box Boron release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> BR/Luis
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 27, 2016, at 4:23 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Luis,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was discussing with our OpenFlow team (Manohar/Muthu/Shuva/Vinayak) 
>>>>> today about the tests - and one of the things which would be very 
>>>>> interesting would be the bulk-o-matic with small/medium/large configs 
>>>>> (same as your test 2) and the following combinations:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Lithium design + the old FRM
>>>>> 2. Lithium design + the new FRM => are there improvements?
>>>>> 3. He design => bulk-o-matic may not have been used for the He/Li
>>>>> 
>>>>> They were also planning to discuss this with Sanjib in their daytime 
>>>>> today if this has been already done.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Abhijit
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I got the action point from last S3P call to start some discussion around 
>>>>> OpenFlow tests we can do for next ODL perf paper (Boron).
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am not sure we will have time for all the below but ideally I was 
>>>>> thinking in 4 tests:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1) REST programming performance:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Goal: Measure OF programming rate using NB REST interface
>>>>> - Methodology: Use test REST scripts (flows in datastore) to program 100K 
>>>>> flows on an OF network of different size: 16-32-64-128 switches, etc...
>>>>> - Test variations: Use single flow/REST request and multiple flows/REST 
>>>>> (bulk) request.
>>>>> - Collected data: controller programming time (from first to last flow) 
>>>>> from REST script, switch programming time (from first to last flow) 
>>>>> polling the OVS, flow confirmation delay (time after T1) polling the 
>>>>> operational DS.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2) Java programming performance:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Goal: Measure OF programming rate using internal Java interface
>>>>> - Methodology: Use bluk-o-matic application (flows in datastore or rpc) 
>>>>> to program 100K flows on an OF network of different size: 16-32-64-128 
>>>>> switches, etc...
>>>>> - Test variations: Use single flow/REST request and multiple flows/REST 
>>>>> (bulk) request.
>>>>> - Collected data: controller programming time (from first to last flow) 
>>>>> from bulk-o-matic, switch programming time (from first to last flow) 
>>>>> polling the OVS, flow confirmation delay (time after T1) polling the 
>>>>> operational DS.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 3) Network message processing latency:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Goal: Measure OF packet message processing time
>>>>> - Methodology: Use some OF public tool (Cbench, MT-Cbench, SDN-blaster) 
>>>>> to generate OF packets and measure the delay (latency mode) of the 
>>>>> received controller flows on an OF network of different size: 
>>>>> 16-32-64-128 switches, etc...
>>>>> - Test variations: Use controller drop-test application in DS and RPC 
>>>>> mode.
>>>>> - Collected data: packet processing rate (latency=1/rate)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 4) Topology scalability:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Goal: Scale OF network and measure learning time.
>>>>> - Methodology: Use some OF public tool (Mininet, Multinet) to generate 
>>>>> different sizes of large topologies: 1000, 2000, 3000 switches, etc...
>>>>> - Collected data: Time for the controller to learn about the topology.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In addition the same tests (or a subset) should run in a cluster 
>>>>> environment (3 node cluster).
>>>>> 
>>>>> The main problem we have today for running and automating the above is 
>>>>> people resources, so far Jin and Sanjib offered to help but more help 
>>>>> would be appreciated.
>>>>> 
>>>>> BR/Luis
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> integration-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/integration-dev
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to