Thanks for the investigation Luis (and Miroslav). We should talk about the FRS in one of the meetings.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote: > So looking at the FRS test in detail, the reason for the multiple failures > is not the OVS version but the FRS feature requiring more time to install > flows + update flow stats in oper DS. > > In general it is bad practice to use sleep in tests but in this case it > was useful to flag the slowness of FRS, in particular: > > - Flows_OF13 suite is failing because we give 1 sec between programming > the flow and see the flow in OVS, with FRS we need more time and that is > why it is fails. > - Stats_Manager_extended suite is failing because we give 3 secs between > programming flows and see them in operational DS, with FRS we need more > time and thats is why it fails. > - The Groups_Meters_OF13 is also failing because CPqD switch cannot > connect to controller, this could be a CPqD issue, with the old FRM is > working but it takes long time to connect. > > Finally you can observe the differences in performance in these jobs: > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/ > openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-scale-stats-collection-daily-frs-only- > boron/plot/ > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/ > openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-scale-stats- > collection-daily-only-boron/plot/ > > The plot titles are not very good but I can explain: > > - Config Performance measures time for updating all flow stats in oper DS > after adding and after deleting. > - Performance rate measures rate and time for getting flows in config DS. > > In both cases the FRM is superior than FRS. > > BR/Luis > > > On Oct 3, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Miro, > > both of the jobs you pointed to are using the same VM to run OVS. > "ubuntu-trusty-mininet-2c-2g" > > is there something about the jobs that would make ovs have a different > version? > > > As for using ovs 2.5, I recall hearing the plan would be to get all of the > openflowplugin csit > running 2.5+. I think it will create some issues that will need to be > debugged and fixed in our > CSIT. > > JamO > > > > On 10/03/2016 06:33 AM, Miroslav Macko wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > Could you please check this two robot tests [1] and [2]? > > > [1] is not failing > > [2] is failing - some flows are rejected by device ("match inconsistent"). > > > It looks like that [1] is running on the OVS version 2.0 and [2] is > probably running on some higher version of the OVS. > > > When we tried to use OVS 2.4 for [1], it was also failing with "match > inconsistent". > > When we tried to use OVS 2.0 for [2], it is also not failing. > > > > We have discussed it with Luis already, and he would like to use OVS > version 2.5.0 for all tests. > > > So it will be needed to update failing flows xml input files > (/test/csit/variables/xmls). > > > Thank you. > > Miro > > > > [1] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/ > openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/ > > > [pastedImage.png] > > > [2] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/ > openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-frs-only-carbon/ > > > > [pastedImage.png] > > > > > MiroslavMacko > > Software Developer > > > Sídlo / Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia > R&D centrum / Janka Kráľa 9 / 974 01 Banská Bystrica / Slovakia > / [email protected] > reception: +421 2 206 65 114 / www.pantheon.sk > > logo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > _______________________________________________ > integration-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/integration-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > integration-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/integration-dev > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
