OK, this will take of first clean up:

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46695
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46696

I also plan to consolidate some of the existing jobs as well as create new ones 
based in OVS 2.5, so just hold for now.

BR/Luis


> On Oct 7, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>  
> +1
> We should clean this up Luis J
>  
> From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 10:00 PM
> To: Luis Gomez
> Cc: Shuva Jyoti Kar; openflowplugin-dev
> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Clean OF test jobs
>  
> Agree Luis. We should go ahead and delete those jobs that you suggest. 
>  
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Shuva, we have non-default plugin jobs running for all branches: beryllium 
> (li plugin), boron (li plugin) and carbon (he plugin).
>  
> Abhijit, we can always recreate a deleted job but there will be no build 
> story for it.
>  
> In general I think we have too many jobs in ofplugin and I do not feel like 
> creating new ones before we clean the existing, it is already complicated to 
> track what we have today.
>  
> So please take a look at:
>  
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/ 
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/>
>  
> And advice how we can clean this up.
>  
> BR/Luis
>  
>  
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> Luis as I understand, the non-default plugin jobs would still be running on 
> stable/Be, am I correct ?
>  
> From: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Luis 
> Gomez
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 2:01 AM
> To: Abhijit Kumbhare
> Cc: openflowplugin-dev
> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Clean OF test jobs
>  
> The idea is to remove the jobs so no, we cannot run them again or look at 
> past test results. To be honest I prefer to have few relevant jobs than many 
> jobs we do not look very much:
>  
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/ 
> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/>
>  
> BR/Luis
>  
>  
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> Makes sense but a question: Will we have these tests available if needed even 
> if they are not actually running?
>  
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Luis Gomez <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to do some cleaning on existing OF test jobs. The first idea I 
> have is to remove the non-default plugin tests for a given branch: In the 
> past it made sense to compare He plugin vs Li plugin in the same branch so we 
> could track the readiness of the second but after the migration I think it 
> would be enough to just compare Boron vs Beryllium if we want to compare 
> plugins. Also by removing the non-default plugin test we will be cutting the 
> amount of jobs by half. Any concern or comment on this?
> 
> BR/Luis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev 
> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev>
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to