I think luis can give better comment about these CSIT test failures, i am not sure what was the state of these test before. Luis, do you see any of these test is failing because of any possible regression?
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anil - what do you think of these Beryllium clustering (Helium design) > test case failures? Particularly the first one below. > > The status of the test case says as non-critical (and the second one below > says as because of bug 6177 which was existing in Beryllium): > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin- > csit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium/722/robot/ > openflowplugin-clustering.txt/Cluster%20HA%20Leader% > 20Follower%20Failover/Add%20Flows%20In%20Leader%20and% > 20Verify%20Before%20Leader%20Restart/ > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin- > csit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium/722/robot/ > openflowplugin-clustering.txt/030%20Cluster%20Sync%20Problems_1/Isolating% > 20Owner%20Of%20Switch%20s1/ > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:01 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote: > >> Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, >> >> >> >> There are some distribution test failures in Beryllium SR4 Build 20161017 >> related to your project. Could you or someone from your team please take a >> moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or >> "BLOCKING" and requires a respin of Beryllium SR4. >> >> >> >> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-c >> sit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium/722/ >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> An Ho >> >> >> >> [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwf >> Vqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=843418255 >> >> [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Bery >> llium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR4_Download >> > > -- Thanks Anil
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
