Thanks Luis for the good summary. On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Few comments after looking at the OpenFlow CI test results: > > 1) As commented this morning Carbon shows more stability than Boron in the > cbench and longevity tests, so please do not forget to cherry-pick changes > Carbon->Boron. > > 2) After looking at Cbench test in detail: > > - Current Throughput test running in CI does not seem to represent > controller performance (Latency test is still fine). This is because I get > much better results when I run the same test locally so I think public > cloud networking is probably impacting here. > - When testing Cbench throughput locally, Boron/Carbon is 2x faster than > Beryllium. This for example cannot be appreciated in the CI test. > > 3) I will open bug for the 2 things I observe in the new scalability tests > and I also commented this morning: > > - Switch connect time is much faster in Beryllium than in Boron/Carbon. > The switch connect time also seems to increase substantially the more > switches are connected to controller. > - Max number of links are double in Beryllium than in Boron/Carbon. The > failure I see is controller cannot see some of the switches after some > iterations. > > BR/Luis > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
