Please let me know if we decide, for some reason, to not merge the revert. I 
will file
a blocking bug on Boron if so. Just so we can track it as the next SR is 
coming. For
now, I'll save my cycles :)

JamO

On 02/14/2017 09:41 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote:
> We can revert the patch [1] by merging patch [2]. Anil, (Luis) are on the way 
> to a Linux Foundation meeting in Tahoe. We can
> do it when we reach.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:22 AM Kochba, Alon <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     + openflowplugin-dev____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     I don't see a reason not to revert this patch [1] (merge [2]) and 
> re-introduce it once we figure out what it breaks.____
> 
>     netvirt CSIT clearly shows the patch is problematic, and has broken Boron 
> for the past week.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     Abhijit/Anil/Jon could we have your view on this?____
> 
>     More details in the thread below.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     I also want to remind you guys that we added 
> "test-openflowplugin-netvirt" keyword, and encourage you to at least trigger
>     it before any patch is merged.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/50153____
> 
>     [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/51814 ____
> 
>     --alon____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     *From:*N Vivekanandan [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>]
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2017 05:12
>     *To:* Vishal Thapar <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; Sam Hague <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>; Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *Cc:* Kochba, Alon <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; odl netvirt 
> dev <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *Subject:* RE: [netvirt-dev] Steps to resolve latest CSIT regressions____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     Hi Sam,____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     We couldn’t get back to you yesterday as we haven’t been able pin the 
> openflowplugin ____
> 
>     review here:____
> 
>     https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/50153____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     “____
> 
>     [1]
>     
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/5/
>     
> https://logs.opendaylight.org/sandbox/jenkins091/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/6/____
> 
>     - 2 csit runs on the reverted openflowplugin patch [2] distro - passes no 
> errors
>     [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/51814____
> 
>     - the reverted openflowplugin  patch____
> 
>     “____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     I agree with you that we can request for revert of this patch from Boron. 
>  I see that you have already placed a -1 on the
>     equivalent____
> 
>     unmerged Master patch here:____
> 
>     https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/51589____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     --____
> 
>     Thanks,____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     Vivek____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     *From:*Vishal Thapar
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, February 14, 2017 7:53 AM
>     *To:* Sam Hague <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Jamo 
> Luhrsen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *Cc:* Kochba, Alon <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; N 
> Vivekanandan <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>; odl netvirt dev 
> <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *Subject:* RE: [netvirt-dev] Steps to resolve latest CSIT regressions____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     I’d vote for reverting the patch. We have enough information to pin it on 
> this one and should get OFPlugin folks to take
>     a look at it. At this point inputs have to come from OFPlugin on what 
> change in netvirt is causing this, if it is.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     I’ll send across a mail to OFPlugin if others agree on this.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     Regards,____
> 
>     Vishal.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     *From:*Sam Hague [mailto:[email protected]]
>     *Sent:* 14 February 2017 07:44
>     *To:* Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *Cc:* Vishal Thapar <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; Kochba, Alon <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>; N Vivekanandan <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; odl netvirt
>     dev <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *Subject:* Re: [netvirt-dev] Steps to resolve latest CSIT regressions____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     Ok, I think we are close to saying the openflowplugin patch is causing 
> problems. Bunch of results below. Quick run down
>     is the openflowplugin patch on boron and on master produces the same 52 
> errors. The revert of the patch on boron passes
>     100%.____
> 
>     Now the question is how to proceed? Do we push to revert that patch or 
> work towards why it is causing problems for
>     netvirt? Seems like we should revert since the master patch is not merged 
> yet.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     Thanks, Sam____
> 
> 
>     [1]
>     
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/5/
>     
> https://logs.opendaylight.org/sandbox/jenkins091/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/6/____
> 
>     - 2 csit runs on the reverted openflowplugin patch [2] distro - passes no 
> errors
>     [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/51814____
> 
>     - the reverted openflowplugin  patch____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     [3] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/50153____
> 
>     - the openflowplugin patch before revert. this patch is already merged.
>     
> https://logs.opendaylight.org/sandbox/jenkins091/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/2/____
> 
>     - fails csit with the 52 errors____
> 
> 
>     [4] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/51589____
> 
>     - the openflowplugin patch on master____
> 
>     - has the same 52 errors
>     [5] 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-gate-stateful-carbon/59/____
> 
>     - gate job against the openflowplugin patch on master - it also hits the 
> 52 errors____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Sam Hague <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:____
> 
>         Hi all,____
> 
> 
>         I reverted the openflowplugin patch [2] and ran csit against it at 
> [1] .That passed 100%. I am running it again as
>         job 6 since we do have random results sometimes. [3] is the revert 
> patch. I also started the gate against the master
>         branch of [2] to see if that fails.____
> 
>         Thanks, Sam____
> 
> 
>         [1]
>         
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/5/
> 
>         [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/50153
> 
>         [3] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/51814
> 
>         [4] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/51589____
> 
>         __ __
> 
>         On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:____
> 
>             I'm trying to set up a local environment to run tempest against 
> and will try to manually
>             reproduce the ovsdb inactivity timeout problem. It is showing up 
> in the first debug
>             collection which happens after the tempest.api.network set of 
> tests.
> 
>             The fact that the timeout didn't matter (5s vs 30s) makes me 
> think something on the
>             controller side has gone for a toss and not coming back. Of 
> course, looking at the
>             karaf logs was fruitless.
> 
>             I have an OPNFV apex virtual setup running. Now, just trying to 
> make tempest work.
>             Once I have that, I can swap in boron distros and debug.
> 
>             JamO
> 
>             On 02/13/2017 10:09 AM, Vishal Thapar wrote:
>             > HI Sam,
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > Not yet. I think we should bring it up with OFPlugin folks. 
> Looking at logs of Alon’s patch in [10], no response even after
>             > 30 seconds. One thing we can probably try is disable inactivity 
> probe altogether, should give an idea if it becomes
>             > responsive or something much worse has gone wrong. Disable it 
> by setting probe timeout to 0.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > This looks like one of those issues where chasing guilty patch 
> may not help. Need to figure out what is going wrong.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > Regards,
>             >
>             > Vishal.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > *From:*Sam Hague [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>]
>             > *Sent:* 13 February 2017 23:35
>             > *To:* Kochba, Alon <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; N 
> Vivekanandan <[email protected]
>             <mailto:[email protected]>>; Vishal Thapar
>             > <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; odl netvirt dev
>             <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>             > *Subject:* Steps to resolve latest CSIT regressions
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > Vivek, Vishal,
>             >
>             > did you find anything else related to the regressions?
>             >
>             > From Vishal's debugging he saw ovsdb inactivity timeouts 
> happening at the default 5s, so we suspected the openflowplugin
>             > patch [1]. We ran test-patch [2] on it, but it also had the 
> same 52 errors so that doesn't look like the culprit. Also ran
>             > the test-patch against the two patches before [1] and they also 
> blew up.
>             >
>             > [5] is the first patch on boron netvirt around when things went 
> south so I am running csit on it with [6]. I tried some other
>             > jobs around then but the distros are being deleted.
>             >
>             > [7] is the job against the openflowplugin job again but using 
> the openflowplugin distribution.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > [10] is the job Alon pushed to check the inactivty-timeout 
> using the patch [11]. Same 52 errors so increasing the
>             > inactivity-timeout to 30s didn't seem to help.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > Thanks, Sam
>             >
>             > [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/50153/
>             >
>             > [2] 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-gate-stateful-boron/17/
>             > [3] 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/netvirt/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-gate-stateful-boron/18/
>             > [4] 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/netvirt/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-gate-stateful-boron/19/
>             >
>             >
>             > [5] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/51456
>             > Bug 7714 <https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7714>- 
> Vpn Interface not deleted from oper DS
>             > [6] 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/1/
>             >
>             > [6] 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-boron-shague/2/
>             >
>             > - using openflowplugin distro from: [1] 
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/50153/
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > [10] 
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-newton-nodl-v2-upstream-stateful-alonko-boron/1/
>             > [11] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/51763/
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > _______________________________________________
>             > netvirt-dev mailing list
>             > [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>             > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/netvirt-dev
>             >____
> 
>         __ __
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     openflowplugin-dev mailing list
>     [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to