On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> wrote:
> +openflowplugin-dev: > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> >> >> Took your patch, built distribution, but openflowplugin ports are not >> opening up on karaf4 distribution, however the same works on karaf3 >> distribution. >> > > could you raise a new Blocker bug in openflowplugin about this, and link > it to https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 ? Currently, > "officially" there "are no blocking problems", and so the Karaf 4 will go > ahead as planned.. I think it's very important over the coming days to give > clear public visibility of the situation. > I've gone ahead and created https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8694 (with no details), just to have a Bug ID assigned to talk about "that problem" - and be able to raise this in the "Nitrogen Release Sync" meeting. > FYI: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8640 was an issue in > openflowjava, but that one is closed. (And indeed that NPE is gone, I > verified; so instead of re-opening that, we need a new one.) > > > Will debug some more and keep you posted. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Faseela >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael >> Vorburger >> *Sent:* Monday, June 12, 2017 4:34 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) genius >> features, for your local testing >> >> >> >> Hello fellow geniusians, >> >> as discussed and committed to during our weekly call last Thursday, I've >> just taken a moment to create https://git.opendaylight.org/g >> errit/#/c/58726/ for a Karaf 4 distribution with (just) genius features. >> >> Faseela, and others interested, you volunteered during that call to take >> this first genius Karaf 4 distribution for a spin for some local functional >> testing, right? I'm curious what you'll find - basically works just fine? >> Or completely broken? ;-) >> >> Let us use https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 to record >> any findings (and required actions) in this regard... I suggest you do not >> overload that single bug, but only use it as an "umbrella", and create new >> linked issues for anything you find. I've already done the same for two >> (very minor) more "technical" issues I've noticed when even just starting >> it up empty. >> >> >> Tx, >> >> M. >> >> -- >> >> Michael Vorburger, Red Hat >> [email protected] | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch >> > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
