Abhijit, Yes I can join this coming week.
-Andy- On 06/28/2017 09:14 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: > I talked with Jozef and Tomas right now - and we think it will be good > to discuss this in the Monday OpenFlow Plugin meeting this process > (steps provided by Andy, the process followed by Sam/NetVirt when they > consumed VPN Service into NetVirt, history, etc.). That way we can > ensure it is done right - have all the OpenFlow Plugin committers vote > during the meeting if needed. And then initiate OpenFlow Java vote. > Hence we will greatly appreciate if Andy (Grimberg) and Sam Hague can > join the meeting. The meeting details are here: > > https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weekly_Project_Meeting_List > > Also pasting below: > > Weekly on Mondays from 08:30-9:30 am PST/PDT | 11:30-12:30 EST/EDT | > 15:30-16:30 UTC during Daylight Time/16:30-17:30 UTC during Standard Time > > * Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/751766361 > * Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +14086380968,751766361# or > +16465588656,751766361# > * Or Telephone: > o Dial: +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll) or +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll) > o Meeting ID: 751 766 361 > o International numbers > available: > https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=RnpzDoDRkdpjWl6TcLb7wYiYV2NYaEUw > * IRC: Freenode: #opendaylight-openflowplugin > > > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Agree with you Ed about having a vote in OpenFlow Java committer > community - and in general the TSC role if we plan to archive. Had > planned on that based on how we have decided to proceed (based on > Tomas's study of impact). Unfortunately I have been offline for > periods of time during the last week or two (on a vacation). > Tomorrow (Wednesday) I will be meeting Jozef Bacigal (OpenFlow Java > & Plugin committer) and Tomas Slusny (OpenFlow Plugin committer > working on this) to understand the latest status on how this has > evolved and based on that will figure out the best course of action > (after discussing with the other OFP/OFJ committers). > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Ed Warnicke <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Abhijit, > This strikes me as good news overall. It might be a > good idea to get a vote from the OpenflowJava Committers, > particularly as they will need to vote to archive the > openflowjava project, and it also makes everything very clear. > As to the TSCs role, it has one for archiving the openflowjava > project, and it would have one if there was some dispute with > the openflowjava committers (which does not appear to be the > case). All of that said, it is probably courteous to inform > the TSC :) > Thank you for guiding this process :) > > Ed > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Thanks Sam! We may have some questions as we go further into > the process. > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:00 PM Sam Hague <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > We have 2 projects for OpenFlow - OpenFlow Plugin > (connection handling, > > state management, apps like the FRM, etc.) & OpenFlow > Java Library (library > > for the low level wire protocol implementation). This > increases the > > logistics related to the OpenFlow southbound > development (done in two > > places) and project reporting overhead. The other > southbounds like OVSDB, > > NetConf, etc. do not have two different projects - > even if some of them may > > have a similar split internally (plugin & library). > > > > Also more importantly currently most community activity > > (meetings/discussions for the new features) happen in > the OpenFlow Plugin > > community even though the implementation needs to be > done in OF Plugin and > > OFJ Library. Also going forward OFJ may have only a > single active committer > > (Jozef Bacigal). > > > > So some of us feel Nitrogen might be a good time to > unify these two > > projects. > > > > The current thought: > > Move all the code from OpenFlow Java Library to the > OpenFlow Plugin. > > > > Advantages: > > 1) This may not need a lot of work. > > 2) All active OpenFlow Java committers are also > committers on OpenFlow > > Plugin. > > 3) Since we are not creating a project & if we do not > add any new committers > > - this may not even need a TSC approval (but we will > work with the TSC when > > we have decided the exact action). > > > > Challenges / open questions: > > 1) How do we retain history for the OpenFlow Java code > for code done before > > the code movement? The IT experts may have some ideas > on this - Thanh, Anil > > B, Andrew? Also is there a way to subsume a project > into another project or > > merge the repos? > > We kept history when we split ovsdb/netvirt and then > merged netvirt > and vpnservice. The flow Andy used copied all the files > into NetVirt > and the history was kept intact. I think I came up with > the commands > to use and Andy did the work - but I can't find those > emails right > now. > > You should also stop the jobs running for the old > openflowjava repo > and migrate them to use openflowplugin repo. > > > One obvious solution, we can just keep the OpenFlow > Java Library repo > > still active - even if OpenFlow Java Library does not > participate in future > > simultaneous releases. > > 2) How do handle the documentation of the 2 projects? > Just move the OpenFlow > > Java documentation inside the developer guide under > OFP documentation? > > Yes, this is what we did - just pulled in the relvant > docs to netvirt. > > > 3) How do we handle the inactive committers of > OpenFlow Java Library? If we > > keep OpenFlow Java Library project active without > participating in > > simultaneous release - we likely do not have to > address this problem. > > > > If you have thoughts/suggestions/objections - please > reply to this email. > > > > Thanks, > > Abhijit > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openflowjava-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowjava-dev > > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowjava-dev> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev> > > > > -- Andrew J Grimberg Lead, IT Release Engineering The Linux Foundation
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
