My question is simple, will OFP devs look and fix FRS related bugs? if yes we 
can restore the FRS jobs, if not I think we are waisting resources.


> On Oct 5, 2017, at 1:27 AM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I would suggest atleast we should open a bug for all the issues. 
> 
> Given that these jobs are remove, how do we verify that the job passes with 
> the new fixes ? Is there any way we can trigger these jobs ?
> 
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> OK, we do not want to use unnecessary resources so here is the patch: 
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/63927/ 
> <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/63927/>
> 
> We can always revert if anybody wants to support FRS in future.
> 
> BR/Luis
> 
> 
>> On Sep 29, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Luis Gomez <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi ofp devs,
>> 
>> We have been marking FRS tests IGNORE for a while because this functionality 
>> has never been stable, my question is should we: 1) remove these jobs as 
>> suggested by this mail or 2) open bugs and fix FRS given we have people for 
>> this.
>> 
>> BR/Luis
>> 
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: [release] CSIT jobs with IGNORE status or no activity to resolve
>>> Date: September 29, 2017 at 9:47:48 AM PDT
>>> To: Release <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>, 
>>> "[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>" 
>>> <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Every release now (including SRs) we have one step to validate
>>> CSIT status. It's becoming very common for projects just to quickly mark 
>>> their
>>> failing jobs as IGNORE or OKAY without providing any bug id or notes
>>> about progress to resolve the failures.
>>> 
>>> There are probably several reasons projects do this, but the end result is 
>>> that
>>> these jobs are not providing any value and just taking up valuable 
>>> resources.
>>> 
>>> We would like to start removing all jobs that go two releases in this same
>>> state.
>>> 
>>> Having jobs with failures is ok. But those failures should be associated 
>>> with
>>> some bug and/or some activity to resolve the failures.
>>> 
>>> We can start this process with the Oxygen release in March, using Nitrogen's
>>> status [0] unless there are objections.
>>> 
>>> Of course, each project would be notified prior to job removal, but the 
>>> goal is
>>> to remove this overhead of investigating the same project CSIT failures. I
>>> took the liberty to do this already for SNMP [1].
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> JamO
>>> 
>>> [0] 
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761
>>>  
>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761>
>>> [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/topic:remove-snmp-csit 
>>> <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/topic:remove-snmp-csit>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> release mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release 
>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release>
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev 
> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks
> Anil

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to