Also be ready for some questions like can this code live in another project in 
ODL so we skip new repo?

> On May 14, 2018, at 7:16 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> For the project extra repo you will have to make the case to the TSC, this is 
> explain in detail the issue you have today and how an extra repo would help 
> with the same. After that you can get approval (or rejection) from TSC.
> 
>> On May 14, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Michael Vorburger <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> afaik we do not allow cycles between projects so this code may require new 
>> project (if this has different scope than original) or new repo to resolve 
>> the conflict.
>> 
>> Can you tell us more about the "new repo" option? If we could have a 2nd 
>> repo, which from a governance perspective is part of the existing genius 
>> project, to host the code that is currently in genius/tools and genius/srm, 
>> and build that before openflowplugin, and then openflowplugin and then after 
>> that the "main" genius, then that is probably a good solution to this 
>> problem.
>> 
>> How would we get that?
>>> On May 14, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Michael Vorburger <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:52 PM, D Arunprakash <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> We are trying to use the genius service recovery framework(srm-api) from 
>>> openflowplugin.
>>> 
>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/68998/ 
>>> <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/68998/>
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Since, odl-genius-srm was exposed as an independent feature and srm-api 
>>> doesn’t dependent on ofp, we didn’t find any issues during compiling or 
>>> feature install.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> But the autorelease validate jenkin build always failing with the below 
>>> error.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-validate-autorelease-fluorine/81/console
>>>  
>>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-validate-autorelease-fluorine/81/console>
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 09:17:41 + ./scripts/determine-merge-order.py
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42 Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42   File "./scripts/determine-merge-order.py", line 80, in <module>
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42     determine_merge_order()
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42   File "./scripts/determine-merge-order.py", line 68, in 
>>> determine_merge_order
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42     for d in deps_order:
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42   File 
>>> "/w/workspace/openflowplugin-validate-autorelease-fluorine/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/networkx/algorithms/dag.py",
>>>  line 197, in topological_sort
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42     raise nx.NetworkXUnfeasible("Graph contains a cycle or graph 
>>> changed "
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42 networkx.exception.Ne 
>>> <http://networkx.exception.ne/>tworkXUnfeasible: Graph contains a cycle or 
>>> graph changed during iteration
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
>>> 
>>> 09:17:42 $ ssh-agent -k
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Could you please let us know if the feature exposed from genius is proper 
>>> or jenkin autorelease script detect the circular dependency, even though 
>>> the odl-genius-srm doesn’t dependent on ofp.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Arun, yeah you (OFP) should be able to depend on odl-genius-srm now, that's 
>>> what all the effort of Moving datastore related utils from mdsalutil to new 
>>> "genius.tools" was all about... I just had a look (on latest master) 
>>> through genius/srm and genius/features/odl-genius-srm to make sure we 
>>> didn't forget anything obvious, but all seems right to me...
>>> 
>>> integration-dev: could any of you shed light on exactly what the failure 
>>> above is trying to tell us - what cycle in the graph has this found?
>>> 
>>> One thought: Are we allowed to have cycles between projects as long as 
>>> artifacts themselves don't have cycles? Because that is what we are doing 
>>> here - ofp wants genius.srm which needs genius.tools, which is independant 
>>> of the rest of all of genius. genius.mdsalutils and the rest of genius is 
>>> dependant on ofp.
>>> 
>>> Or is that ^^^ is a problem for integration/autorelease? But why? there 
>>> isn't really a cycle; and you can build this in a Maven reactor from 
>>> sources without requiring binaries. 
>>> 
>>> Otherwise we have a bigger problem. Resolving that would require an entire 
>>> new ODL project. OMG the paperwork... :-(
>>> 
>>> Tx,
>>> M.
>>> --
>>> Michael Vorburger, Red Hat
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | IRC: vorburger 
>>> @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch <http://vorburger.ch/>
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Arun
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> genius-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/genius-dev 
>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/genius-dev>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev 
>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev>
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to