Vous (Nicolas Mailhot) avez écrit : > > I don’t know for the "etc." but for README & INSTALL files I think > > they are not needed. Since you can embed informations about the font > > in the font file itself > > And you are wrong.
C’est dit avec tant de délicatesse ! > That restricts redistribution of fonts to font > designers. And font designers are poor distributors, when they bother > about distribution at all (they mostly want to play with fonts and > hope someone else will take care of the boring logistics) I did not say that you should not take care of packaging. Just that we have Information field in "name" table (& I deeply regret that most of fonts does not provide info here) where README content would fit well. Plus, installing fonts is not a per font process, so I continue to think that documenting it once on the web site would be enough. > If you want FLOSS fonts to spread they *must* abide with the > conventions distributors are comfortable with. "spread"? For myself I just want FLOSS fonts to be good. Ruling the world is the second step! -- Pierre Marchand « désignateur » _______________________________________________ Openfontlibrary mailing list Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary
