>Le Mer 13 mai 2009 00:19, Dave Crossland a ?crit : > >> Another alternative is to refer to our fonts as "FLOSS fonts" instead >> of "libre fonts." > >I'd rather not use FLOSS. It's a software-oriented acronym and whether >fonts are software or not is another can of worms best avoided.
_http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/antipiracy/fonts.html_ (http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/antipiracy/fonts.html) Adobe certainly thinks they are: What about fonts? Fonts are software, too. In fact, each font is a short software program. Fonts are protected under intellectual property law and are subject to the same legal usage restrictions as other software. It is illegal to do the following: Share or copy fonts beyond what the license agreement allows Include a font copy with source files for output **************Dell Mini Netbooks: Great deals starting at $299 after instant savings! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221972443x1201442012/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B214819441%3B36680237%3Bi)
