On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 08:33 -0500, Eric Herkert-Oakland wrote: > I took a swing at it. I went with your straight forward suggestion > for time. Had to make it 10px taller to accomodate the dino. If that > doesn't work, let me know.
I'd suggest actually incorporating the oflb logo with a few letters, e.g. OFL, GDFL, MIT, but the important things should be that (1) they all share the same graphic element, and (2) they all use the same text treatment. Otherwise you get into issues like rules regarding the use of institutional logos (like the MIT logo), and making sure that there's no implicit impression that (say) MIT or FSF has sanctioned a particular font. I am not sure MIT would like to be associated with a dinosaur. Really, though, like creative commons, it's a question of what you can do with the font, not who wrote the licence - redistribute as-is embed in other works give attribution create derivative designs commercial use rename-if-you-change-it What's being solved by logos for font licences? Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
