Le dimanche 14 février 2010 à 21:27 +0100, Nicolas Spalinger a écrit : > I doubt your automatically produced deb or rpm is up to the standards to > become part of a distro archive. It will create problems with existing > open font packages and duplication pains. Not cool.
Given perfect fonts (with proper naming, versionning, description & licensing info in the metadata) I don't think it would be that difficult to auto-generate rpms that comply with fedora packaging standards. Unfortunately, real-world fonts are far from perfect and require a human to painstakingly cross-check and correct those elements before packaging. -- Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
