On May 19, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:

> On 19 May 2010 22:09, Garrick Van Buren <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On May 19, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>> 
>>> FOUT?
>> 
>> Yes, that's what I've heard the major benefit is.
>> I don't see it as significant an issue to warrant getting Javascript 
>> involved.
> 
> For large fonts, active() is nice I think.
> 
> http://code.google.com/apis/webfonts/docs/webfont_loader.html#Events

Yes, I'd much rather see work being done to make large fonts smaller. 

--
Garrick.

Reply via email to