On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:42:05PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le Lun 21 mars 2011 13:37, Khaled Hosny a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 04:05:32AM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > >> On 21 March 2011 02:13, Christopher Adams <ch...@raysend.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > The question I want to pose to this list is, what is the best solution > >> > for OFLB to generate webfonts on the fly for all uploaded font files? > >> > >> Given uploads require a TTF, then the only conversion neccessary is to > >> generate an EOT with ttf2eot - since all platforms support TTF web > >> fonts now, except MSIE before v9 (although, MSIE9 only supports TTF > >> with an fsType of 0) > > > > I'd prefer using WOFF when supported, the compression ratio is ~50% in > > my tests and this can be significant for many fonts. > > Compared to raw files or compared to HTTP with mod_deflate or similar ?
Compared to raw TTF files, I couldn't test with server side compression (or whatever it is called), but it is available and reliable that would be OK too, I have no interest in WOFF beyond the compression it provides. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Egyptian Arab
