On 6/7/2011 10:38 AM, ext Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:14:05 ext christian.lo...@hamburg.de wrote:
> Proposal:
> I like to propose the creation of a new Qt 5 module: Qt Community
> Contributions (QtContribs). It should contain classes that are maintained
> by the “non-Nokia” community and the barrier for new code should be lower.
> There shouldn't be a distinction between the "Nokia" and "non-Nokia" parts of
> the community. That's the whole point of Open Governance IMHO - code is judged
> on merit, not on company affiliation.

Albert is correct. Nevertheless we should probably have some kind of 
"Incubator" or staging area for new code (KDE calls this 
"kdeplayground", see https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground). Once 
a class is mature, it should be moved into the correct module or make it 
a module of its own (if it already isn't its own module inside the 
playground area, then it would just need moving). The more common case 
will be a (partial) rewrite of an existing class/module, which will come 
naturally as a git clone of an existing released module.

> Non-Trolls are capable of writing
> quality code too you know

This is very important to answer whether or not to have a module with 
more relaxed barriers for _releasing_. I don't think we should have 
that. When a class or module is considered good for release, then its 
just that. Everything else will lead to people moving their code into 
this repo in order to avoid getting things right, which hurts the 
Project's reputation (more than Nokia's).

Cheers,
   Daniel

-- 
Daniel Molkentin, Software Engineer,
Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
website: http://qt.nokia.com
Rudower Chaussee 13, DE-12489 Berlin

Nokia gate5 GmbH
Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443 B
Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Tähtivuori

_______________________________________________
Opengov mailing list
Opengov@qt-labs.org
http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov

Reply via email to