On Aug 8, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Lubos Kosco wrote: > > +1 , BUT next version of opengrok has to be a major one (e.g. 0.7 ) + > *properly* tested ;) > (I guess folks on this forum could help with the full test on their > setups, hmm ? > I can imagine everyone has it's own(& special) environment, so if we > all > join hands for a proper testing 0.7 could be a very nice & stable > opengrok release.) >
I guess you (and everyone else that subscribe to opengrok-discuss) have seen all of the "findbugs" commit messages posted to the forum lately. We are currently ramping up the "QA/QE" effort on the project (big kudos to J?rgen for his effort!), so I hope 0.7 will be the best release so far! I would encourage everyone to write JUnit tests, fix bugs, update documentation!!! >> So the question is can we do an upgrade? >> Or as a second alternative have this client on a side project and >> building Java 6. >> >> Also I propose to change the base structure to: >> >> trunk/web - web part of OpenGrok >> trunk/backend - Main OpenGrok server >> trunk/client - clients directory (building with Java 6) >> > > let's use a map (I have an $ ant clean repo + pmd set up - <phew> > 500 > warnings it says ;) ), to see if I understand it correctly > You have pmd set up? Hmm.. I guess I missed the email with the patch ;-) > > If you're already up to for some cleaning, why not rename some files > in > root and use the same convention as the rest of open source world ? > e.g. > CHANGES.txt --> ChangeLog (or CHANGES) I suggest we just remove the file, because the content of this file is just a rewrite of http://src.opensolaris.org/source/history/opengrok/trunk/ Cheers, Trond
