Lubos Kosco <Lubos.Kosco at Sun.COM> writes: > Trond Norbye wrote: >> >> >> On 17. okt. 2009, at 21.12, Lubos Kosco <Lubos.Kosco at Sun.COM> wrote: >> >>> Kiffin Gish wrote: >>>> I couldn't find it in any documentation, so I was wondering if >>>> there's an overview somewhere about the search regular expressions >>>> that opengrok supports. >>>> >>> >>> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/help.jsp >>> usually points out most of the stuff, for more info go for lucene >>> query syntax >>> >>> also I am not really aware that we support full regexp search, >>> maybe we should go for >>> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/lucene-contrib/index.html#regex, >>> please file a bug for this if you think it could be a nice feature >>> (hmm, I also noted lucene went to 2.9.0 ... hmm, we should maybe >>> upgrade again, Trond ? :) ) >>> >>> >> >> Feel free :) > > :-D > > it seems it will be even more complicated then going to 2.4.1 , they > claim we could get small performance improvement, but build says: > > opengrok-lucene\src\org\opensolaris\opengrok\search\SearchEngine.java:49: > warning: [deprecation] org.apache.lucene.search.TopDocCollector in > org.apache.lucene.search has been deprecated [...] > 31 warnings
Well, they are only warnings... > which means a lot of code changes ... again ... <sigh> > > let's leave it for next release then, let's stabilize 0.8 and get it > out as soon as we can, hmm ? +1. We don't have any bugs or performance problems that we know of that will be fixed by an upgrade, do we? So let's wait. > I am thinking we could release a RC once kah blesses the javadb cache, hmm ? Bug #11662 and #12081 should be fixed. I'll try to find some time to get it done... -- Knut Anders
