Lubos Kosco <Lubos.Kosco at Sun.COM> writes:

> Trond Norbye wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17. okt. 2009, at 21.12, Lubos Kosco <Lubos.Kosco at Sun.COM> wrote:
>>
>>> Kiffin Gish wrote:
>>>> I couldn't find it in any documentation, so I was wondering if
>>>> there's an overview somewhere about the search regular expressions
>>>> that opengrok supports.
>>>>
>>>
>>> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/help.jsp
>>> usually points out most of the stuff, for more info go for lucene
>>> query syntax
>>>
>>> also I am not really aware that we support full regexp search,
>>> maybe we should go for
>>> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/lucene-contrib/index.html#regex,
>>> please file a bug for this if you think it could be a nice feature
>>> (hmm, I also noted lucene went to 2.9.0 ... hmm, we should maybe
>>> upgrade again, Trond ? :) )
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Feel free :)
>
> :-D
>
> it seems it will be even more complicated then going to 2.4.1 , they
> claim we could get small performance improvement, but build says:
>
> opengrok-lucene\src\org\opensolaris\opengrok\search\SearchEngine.java:49:
> warning: [deprecation] org.apache.lucene.search.TopDocCollector in
> org.apache.lucene.search has been deprecated
[...]
> 31 warnings

Well, they are only warnings...

> which means a lot of code changes ... again ... <sigh>
>
> let's leave it for next release then, let's stabilize 0.8 and get it
> out as soon as we can, hmm ?

+1. We don't have any bugs or performance problems that we know of that
will be fixed by an upgrade, do we? So let's wait.

> I am thinking we could release a RC once kah blesses the javadb cache, hmm ?

Bug #11662 and #12081 should be fixed. I'll try to find some time to get
it done...

-- 
Knut Anders

Reply via email to