coolbeans, so we should *in theory* be able to easily extend the ctags to cover 
the scala stuff... so whats missing to fully support Scala?


________________________________
 From: Lubos Kosco <lubos.ko...@oracle.com>
To: Lubos Kosco <lubos.ko...@oracle.com> 
Cc: opengrok-user <a22489001-openg...@yahoo.co.uk>; 
"opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org" <opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org>; Knut 
Anders Hatlen <knut.hat...@oracle.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2011, 7:34
Subject: Re: [opengrok] c# support on opengrok-0.10
 


:) as the matter of fact jens already fixed this, so I guess this
    can be a precedent:

http://src.opensolaris.org/source/diff/opengrok/trunk/src/org/opensolaris/opengrok/analysis/Ctags.java?r2=%2Fopengrok%2Ftrunk%2Fsrc%2Forg%2Fopensolaris%2Fopengrok%2Fanalysis%2FCtags.java%401180%3A9ea13d0916bd&r1=%2Fopengrok%2Ftrunk%2Fsrc%2Forg%2Fopensolaris%2Fopengrok%2Fanalysis%2FCtags.java%401148%3Ab42a9515757a

--
L

On 30.11.2011 8:29, Lubos Kosco wrote: 

>Yes, below would definitely work, there is already a bug in our
      bugzilla to make exctags more configurable in adding mor lang defs
      or 
>in spite of what Vlad wrote yesterday - 
>http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/Supported+Languages+and+Formats
>- some of these extensions are not known to ctags and we don't
      pass them on (that is what the bug talks about)
>
>so from this point of view if we had a nice way to control more of
      ctags params, adding below would be just a peanut
>
>I don't know the bug # from top of my head, but I think we talked
      about kshlib there (which is not part of ctags known extensions),
      its implementation shouldn't be that hard (it's just parameter
      parsing and passing on to ctags), any takers? 
>
>thnx for the pointers
>L
>
>On 30.11.2011 2:41, opengrok-user wrote: 
>To be honest, highlighting would be a good start :).
>>
>>
>>Also, what about these - hardly comprehensive but a start:
>>http://scala-programming-language.1934581.n4.nabble.com/Simple-ctags-etags-support-td1939562.html
>>
>>
>>https://github.com/spencertipping/scala-ctags/blob/master/scala-ctags
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>A
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Lubos Kosco <lubos.ko...@oracle.com>
>>To: opengrok-user <a22489001-openg...@yahoo.co.uk> 
>>Cc: "Gandhi, Shailey" <shailey.gan...@morganstanley.com>; 
>>"opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org" <opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org>; Knut 
>>Anders Hatlen <knut.hat...@oracle.com> 
>>Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2011, 15:35
>>Subject: Re: [opengrok] c# support on opengrok-0.10
>> 
>>
>>
>>This will be slightly tricky, since exuberant ctags
                  doesn't support scala:
>>http://ctags.sourceforge.net/languages.html
>>
>>so opengrok analyzer will just add simple syntax
                  highlighting, but no defs/refs databases :(
>>(hence no symbols, method names, variables, etc.) 
>>
>>--
>>L
>>
>>On 29.11.2011 14:33, opengrok-user wrote: 
>>Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>Can we also get Scala support added into the trunk?  Or is it already in?
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>A
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
opengrok-discuss mailing list opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opengrok-discuss 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
opengrok-discuss mailing list opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opengrok-discuss 
_______________________________________________
opengrok-discuss mailing list
opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opengrok-discuss

Reply via email to