Hi Vlad.

You can try to use our patch for this case.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1529516&group_id=4797&atid=304797
It would be included in 2.2.5 release.
Please test it and report how it works.

Regards,
Alex.

Vladyslav Bakayev пишет:

> Ok, that can be a solution. I am just not sure how complicated would 
> become configuration in the following case:
>
> [EP::GW1]
> GatewayPriority=1
>
> [EP::GW2]
> GatewayPriority=2
>
> [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints]
> 10.0.0.1=GW1;555,777
> 10.0.0.2=GW2;555,777
>
> As described in the example, we would have same priorities on gateway 
> selection in case of called number 555x and in case of called number 
> 777x. In schematic notation:
> called=555x -> GW1, if fail then GW2
> called=777x -> GW1, if fail then GW2
>
> What we would need to put in configuration to have them in different way?
> called=555x -> GW1, if fail then GW2
> called=777x -> GW2, if fail then GW1
>
> Best regards,
> Vladyslav.
>
>
> On 26/10/06, *Zygmuntowicz Michal* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Failover order is determined by gateway priorities (defined in [EP::]
>     sections).
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: "Vladyslav Bakayev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>     Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:17 AM
>
>
>     > Hello Jan,
>     >
>     > One more question on the failover functionality. If we have only
>     internal
>     > policy which can be used for failover gateway selection, can we
>     describe
>     > some priorities on those gateways? As I understand, having several
>     > gateways
>     > now for a single prefix will lead to round-robin selection.
>     >
>     > On 27/09/06, Jan Willamowius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Hi Eduard,
>     >>
>     >> failover to permanent endpoints should work. But neighbors, virtual
>     >> queues etc. aren't supported right now.
>     >>
>     >> Supporting those policies would mean we have to move from the
>     current
>     >> approach of calculating all possible routes in advance to
>     finding routes
>     >> one at a time after one route has failed.
>     >>
>     >> Thats sure doable, but the initial funding for the failover
>     extension
>     >> didn't cover all advanced features. Hopefully we can setup a
>     project to
>     >> add that soon.
>     >>
>     >> Regards,
>     >> Jan
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Eduard Iacoboaia wrote:
>     >> > Hi.
>     >> >
>     >> > The doc says that the failover works only in internal routing
>     policy
>     >> > (meaning that it searches the destination in RegistrationTable).
>     >> > Is there any way to do failover on neighbors? or
>     PermanentEndpoints? I
>     >> > have 2 proxies to which i want to route calls with failover.
>     >> > This is my config:
>     >> >
>     >> > [RasSrv::Neighbors]
>     >> > eones=x.x.x.x:1729;0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
>     >> > voce3=y.y.y.y:1729;0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
>     >> >
>     >> > [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints]
>     >> > x.x.x.x=eones;0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
>     >> > y.y.y.y=voce3;0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
>     >> >
>     >> > [EP::voce3]
>     >> > Capacity=30
>     >> > GatewayPriority=1
>     >> >
>     >> > [EP::eones]
>     >> > Capacity=30
>     >> > GatewayPriority=2
>     >> >
>     >> > [RoutingPolicy]
>     >> > default=explicit,internal,parent,neighbor
>     >> >
>     >> > Thanks.
>     >> >
>     >> >
>     >> > Eduard
>
>
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
>     security?
>     Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
>     job easier
>     Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
>     Geronimo
>     http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>     <http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642>
>     _______________________________________________________
>
>     Posting: mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
>     Unsubscribe:
>     http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
>     Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> SY, Vlad.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________________
>
>Posting: mailto:[email protected]
>Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
>Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
>Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:[email protected]
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

Reply via email to