But, from the other side: there are some cases when the problem is 
exists, but CPU & memory usage are at the normal level.
I noticed another (?) error mesasages in debug:

2007/02/19 10:11:10.070 3           yasocket.cxx(654)   Q931d   
xx.xx.xx.xx:1720
 Error(1): Input/output error (12:32)
2007/02/19 10:11:10.070 3       ProxyChannel.cxx(4617)  Proxy   
yy.yy.yy.yy:6306
1 forward blocked
2007/02/19 10:11:10.070 5       ProxyChannel.cxx(611)   Q931d   Reading 
from xx.
xx.xx.xx:1720
2007/02/19 10:11:10.070 3           yasocket.cxx(654)   Q931d   
xx.xx.xx.xx:1720
 Error(0): Interrupted system call (10:9)

They are encountered when the load of gk is pretty huge, so I suppose 
that these errors are also refered to the similar problem.

Regards,
Alex.

Alex Golyshev пишет:

>Michal,
>
>Yes, you are right. TOP said that CPU usage is about 100%
>
>last pid: 9257; load averages: 1.02, 1.00, 0.78 up 53+13:00:58 15:02:01
>50 processes: 2 running, 48 sleeping
>CPU states: 73.3% user, 0.0% nice, 26.7% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle
>Mem: 55M Active, 693M Inact, 180M Wired, 44M Cache, 110M Buf, 16M Free
>Swap: 2005M Total, 84K Used, 2005M Free
>
>Memory is also seems to be exhasted. Is it some memory leak in gnugk?
>
>Other stats:
>
>%netstat -s -p tcp
>tcp:
>13644382 packets sent
>8182965 data packets (1054165771 bytes)
>28826 data packets (9213821 bytes) retransmitted
>7753 data packets unnecessarily retransmitted
>0 resends initiated by MTU discovery
>3994884 ack-only packets (1874075 delayed)
>0 URG only packets
>0 window probe packets
>25261 window update packets
>1412446 control packets
>16225442 packets received
>9619140 acks (for 1051061672 bytes)
>714837 duplicate acks
>0 acks for unsent data
>6876534 packets (706198705 bytes) received in-sequence
>12175 completely duplicate packets (655564 bytes)
>145 old duplicate packets
>1051 packets with some dup. data (69771 bytes duped)
>36363 out-of-order packets (11418118 bytes)
>0 packets (0 bytes) of data after window
>0 window probes
>25536 window update packets
>20958 packets received after close
>6 discarded for bad checksums
>0 discarded for bad header offset fields
>0 discarded because packet too short
>484742 connection requests
>451499 connection accepts
>15180 bad connection attempts
>0 listen queue overflows
>62 ignored RSTs in the windows
>910231 connections established (including accepts)
>955108 connections closed (including 7854 drops)
>471100 connections updated cached RTT on close
>471438 connections updated cached RTT variance on close
>205811 connections updated cached ssthresh on close
>663 embryonic connections dropped
>9586399 segments updated rtt (of 9156114 attempts)
>56844 retransmit timeouts
>253 connections dropped by rexmit timeout
>0 persist timeouts
>0 connections dropped by persist timeout
>502 keepalive timeouts
>472 keepalive probes sent
>30 connections dropped by keepalive
>18391 correct ACK header predictions
>4994989 correct data packet header predictions
>452456 syncache entries added
>2483 retransmitted
>2229 dupsyn
>0 dropped
>451499 completed
>0 bucket overflow
>0 cache overflow
>449 reset
>193 stale
>0 aborted
>0 badack
>315 unreach
>0 zone failures
>0 cookies sent
>0 cookies received
>1871 SACK recovery episodes
>2313 segment rexmits in SACK recovery episodes
>2935473 byte rexmits in SACK recovery episodes
>16182 SACK options (SACK blocks) received
>4508 SACK options (SACK blocks) sent
>0 SACK scoreboard overflow
>
>%netstat -m -p tcp
>7/758/765 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
>0/134/134/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
>0/128 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache)
>0/0/0/0 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
>0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
>0/0/0/0 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
>1K/457K/459K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
>776457/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
>0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
>0/8/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
>0 requests for sfbufs denied
>0 requests for sfbufs delayed
>0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
>5040 calls to protocol drain routines
>
>I'll try to use recent CVS 2.2.6 version. Maybe it will work fine?
>
>Regards,
>Alex.
>
>Zygmuntowicz Michal пишет:
>
>  
>
>>Did you try to examine CPU/memory usage with top or other utility?
>>One strange thing I notice is that in you log, the timeout happens 
>>immediatelly
>>after connecting the socket.
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Alex Golyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:14 PM
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi all.
>>>
>>>I've found a strange bug (?) in gnugk 2.2.5. After some working time gk
>>>starts to drop calls with reason 102 (Recovery from timer expiry).
>>>Log tells me that gk can't establish Q931 TCP connection wih remote party:
>>>
>>>2007/02/17 18:45:12.290 3       ProxyChannel.cxx(2946)  Q931    Connect
>>>to xx.xx.xx.xx:1720 from yy.yy.yy.yy:0 successful
>>>2007/02/17 18:45:12.290 3           yasocket.cxx(654)   Q931d
>>>xx.xx.xx.xx:1720 Error(1): Input/output error (12:57)
>>>2007/02/17 18:45:12.290 3       ProxyChannel.cxx(2618)  Q931    Timed
>>>out waiting for a response to Setup message from xx.xx.xx.xx:1720
>>>
>>>So looks like gk gets some bad info from destinaion.. But from that
>>>moment many calls to different ip-addresses drop with the same error.
>>>I calculated that there was 15% of successful calls to usual value.
>>>After restarting gk returns to the normal state: calls are going through
>>>with no problem.
>>>
>>>I'm not sure that it is a gnugk problem, maybe calls drop due to tcp/ip
>>>full socket buffers etc.
>>>
>>>Gnugk 2.2.5, release version with the prefix prioroty patch. Failover is
>>>enabled, full proxy mode.
>>>OpenH323 1.18.0, PWLib 1.10.0. FreeBSD 6.1-Release.
>>>
>>>Does anybody have similar problems?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Alex.
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>>opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>>http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>>_______________________________________________________
>>
>>Posting: mailto:[email protected]
>>Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
>>Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
>>Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>_______________________________________________________
>
>Posting: mailto:[email protected]
>Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
>Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
>Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:[email protected]
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

Reply via email to