Once again, it is I who apologize and hope not to distract the list
again. My fault.
John Gage
"Daniel L. Johnson, MD" wrote:
>
> I apologize to the list for this posting, which was a private message to
> John explaining my personal reasons for not adopting FreeMed right now
> as he sugested in a reply to another post. It was private because
> I did not want these opinions, which are idiosyncratic and subject
> to revision, to affect the list in general.
>
> In general, private messages should not be posted to any list without
> obtaining the permission of the sender.
>
> Sincerely,
> Danl Johnson
>
> "John S. Gage" wrote:
> >
> > I take it that RedHat ("Under the Radar: How Red Hat Changed the
> > Software Business and Took Microsoft by Surprise" by Robert Young, Wendy
> > Goldman Rohm) has nothing to do with competition with a commercial
> > vendor? I take it that you are not on the RedHat bus? What are the
> > design issues with FreeMed, so that the group can examine them?
> > John Gage
> >
> > "Daniel L. Johnson, MD" wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is exactly what Freemed does. Precisely. There is a link to
> > > > Freemed on Minoru.
> > > > John Gage
> > >
> > > Well, I know about Freemed. There are some design issues there;
> > > more importantly I have spoken to the programmer and the whole
> > > project is mainly an attempt to destroy a disliked commercial
> > > vendor. I don't want to climb on that bus.
> > >
> > > Danl Johnson
