>
> Open source is a spirit, a spirit that can be organized to
> death, a spirit that can be commercialized to death. Let's just have fun
> writing and sharing programs in source code form - Gunther Schadow
>
> Thanks Gunther for the great synopsis of OSS's roots it is very helpful to
> have in the forum archive. It prompted me to re-read my original email and
I
> realized I meant to say:
>
> >If that was a critical step to moving forward then WHAT IS the nut we
have
> to crack?
>
> I've been enjoying the pleasures of being an in-patient at the Trillium
> Health Centre for the last 6 days and the nurse served too much champagne
> last night for my nightcap so my hand eye coordination was a little off. I
> get discharged today so no more homeoffice with room service. Nevertheless
I
> think Gunther intuited what I really meant to ask and has offered us some
> excellent ideas.
>
> One of the patterns I have noticed in IT and in lots of other domains is
the
> dynamic dance between forces for integration and those for
> differentiation.....trying to collectively decide what the "kernel" is the
> "integration" we need so we can productively "differentiate" for the
benefit
> of all. This is the process we are living right now in this forum. In an
> earlier email I introduced the concept of the "minimum solution" ie. not
> perfect consensus but enough to create forward movement with the smallest
> number of wasted efforts possible. I think we have to define what this
> solution or "kernel" is so we can move closer to the exponential part of
the
> growth curve.
>
> Now if we can't define a "minimum solution" / kernel / tipping point, or
> whatever you want to call it, then just following the motto Gunther has
> provided will work too. It will be slower because we will be using a
> slightly less self-aware and more inefficent version of natural selection
> but it will work.
>
> My deep thoughts for the day...legally under the influence so I do not
> accept any responsibilty for what I have said.
>
> Cheers to all,
>
> Joseph
>
>
>

Reply via email to