> Agenda:
> 1. Quick Introductions.....Fun...bonding, maybe we can play guess who's who.... pin
>the name tag on the > person...will the real "..........." please stand up.
I'm bringing a camera and posting the pictures. So if you want to
remain anonymous, be careful. <s>
> 2. Roundtable, interesting developments and opportunities
This is a great idea, on short notice. I don't think we can put
together anything formal in this time period. But then that's
why you first called it a BOF wasn't it? <g>
> 3. Next OSHCA meeting
Why shouldn't THIS be an OSHCA meeting?
What exactly defines an OSHCA meeting?
Would it not be any gathering of two or more individuals that
have acknowledged the existence and purposes of OSHCA? Since
there is no 'membership' then how many people does it take to
make a 'quorum'? <g>.
Do we have to poll the OSHCA mailing list to see if 'anyone'
objects to it being an OSHCA meeting? If so, does one supporter
over-rule several?
These issues are one of the reasons that I posted the suggestion
about moving the website to a place like SourceForge so that we
may be able to get more activity labeled as OSHCA. I only
received one response. So, does this indicate a lack of interest
in OSHCA or confusion over how decisions are made?
BTW: The posting to the OSHCA mailing list is the only one I've
seen on the list.
Bud, how many people are on the list?
-- Tim Cook --
Cook Information Systems | Office: (901) 884-4126 8am-5pm CDT
Free Practice Management | http://FreePM.org
Censorship: The reaction of the ignorant to freedom.
