[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> thanks for the insightful discussion so far.
>
> Since we (www.resmedicinae.org) are on the verge of implementing
> a practice management system tailored for German GP's the
> following rang a bell:
>
> > cooperate on developing archetypes. The rest is up to the vagaries of human users.
>But I can tell you that in Australia,
> > it is quite likely that groups like the RACGP will develop GP archetypes for all
>the common concepts, based on our initial
> selection of about 50, and will try to standardise those for use by GP systems.
>
> Please, can anyone point us in the direction of where we can
> contact the mentioned group ? Of course, legal requirements
> (like billing, etc.) are way different over here we don't want
> to duplicate effort on the medical side of the system. And if
> it cooperates with CORBAmed/GEHR, all the better :-)
Well, the RACGP is just one example. But try contacting Dr Sam Heard, the clinical
lead on GEHR at [EMAIL PROTECTED] He
will give you his thoughts on how archetype development could work.
In a few days we will post the 50 working XML-schema archetypes on our source page. (I
am just debugging them now with the
kernel test cases).
- thomas beale
