Tim Benson wrote:
> 
> While into philosophy, both Heidegger and Karl Popper (who had very
> different politics) were reacting against the legacy of Plato.  Plato has a
> lot to answer for with his idea that there is a fundamental ideal to which
> we need to get ever closer.  It is dangerous rubbish.  Popper had the right
> idea, in science and social engineering, that we can only ever hope to
> minimise the bad, not achieve perfection.  It sounds like what computer
> programming is all about.
> 
> If anyone wants a good book to read over Christmas, I would strongly
> recommend Karl Popper's "The Open Society and Its Enemies".
> 
> Tim Benson

Since that's such an *easy* read <g>. The well rounded person
would want to read the contrasting opinion of George Sophos "Open
Society [Reforming Global Capitalism]" for a philosophy of
economics.
Bend these ideas a little towards the sustainability of open
source. I found it interesting.  While not the easiest read book,
the content somewhat makes up for the writing style. 

-- Tim Cook, President --
Free Practice Management,Inc. | http://FreePM.com
Office: (901) 884-4126
Censorship: The reaction of the ignorant to freedom.

Reply via email to