Andrew Ho wrote:


> 
> Yes, the key (no pun intended :-) to this, I think, is to not even think
> about the crypto part. Crypto is just the implementation details while the
> important stuff is in the who and where of the information flow
> (protocol).
> 
Well, so far, we have been unable to do that!  That's why I 
started using language about assertions.  I wanted to find a 
way to talk about this functionally, without mentioning the 
words hash, key or encryption.

Reply via email to