>Dr Nikki Ellis wrote: > >> Why tables? They suggest a need for a relational design... why not ask >> physicians to define objects and utilise the unique power of OO >>design > for medical applications? > >Well, I am about to expose what a simple (old, old-fashioned) fool I am. >I understand 'tables' of data. You and about a million other physicians. What do lab reports look like for god's sake? And, by the way, where did Codd get the idea in the first place, "Gee, let me see how esoteric I can be today?" Objects are great, until you realize that they work *against* standard data representations. John
- programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) Woodhouse, Gregory J.
- Re: programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) John S. Gage
- Re: programming (was: Disenfranchised docto... Wayne Wilson
- Re: programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) John S. Gage
- Re: programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) Andrew po-jung Ho
- RE: programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) Dr Nikki Ellis
- RE: programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) Andrew Ho
- RE: programming (was: Disenfranchised docto... John S. Gage
- RE: programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) Andrew po-jung Ho
- RE: programming (was: Disenfranchised doctors) Andrew Ho
- John S. Gage
