|
This will not work.
At the most primitive level, you will need to do a
Soundex search to register existing as well as new patients.
Practically speaking, the Patient Registrars are
going to have to ask Name/Sex/Birthdate.
Jim Purvins
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 12:42
PM
Subject: Re: FAM-MED] Help requested on
Unique Patient Identifiers
How about the following:
First digit would be 0
= female 1 = male
next 8 digits are the D.O.B. (as best can be
determined!) with the year first (4 digits), followed by month (2 digits)
followed by day (2 digits)
this will allow easy sorting by sex, then
age
next is two digit code for race (and more specific)(excuse but this
is truly arbitrary, no intention for leaving anyone out, just trying to be
brief, sorry if politically incorrect..but you get the point) 00 =
white/causcausian; 01 = black/african american; 02 = american
indian; 03 = hispanic/puerto rico; 04 = hispanic/latin american; 05 =
mexican; 06 = Indian/India-Pakistan; 07 = Oriental/Chinese; 08 =
Oriental/Japanese; 09 = Australian/Aborigine....etc....etc.. This will
allow sort even now for specific populations and can account of 99
specific classifications (this would be the only item people would have to
look up or have a pull down box/menu for at input time).
Next,
first 4 letters of Last name (given at time of birth, adopted would be
adopted last name) (if Name is only 1 letter, 2 letters or 3 letters, just
complete 4 letter code with a Z)
Next, first 3 letters of First
name (given at time of birth) (if Name is only 1 letter, 2 letters,
just complete 3 letter code with a Z)
Therefore a code for a patient
that has the following information will be: Male, 32 years old DOB
3/31/1969, white, John Doeh
11969033100DOEHJOH
Female, 65 years
old DOB 4/01/1936, black, Monica
Jamison
01036040101JAMIMON
Female, 1 year old DOB 2/14/2000,
hispanic, Abigayle Mendez
02000021403MENDABI
In running all
sorts of sorting programs and problems this process seems to work.
Just enough information to provide variability, not too much to become
unweildy. I think this will work. Duplicate
numbers will be nearly impossible, especially with a relatively closed
population of say 100,000 to 200,000. With millions I'm not 100% sure, but
I think it likely will hold true and be a stable Unique Patient
Identifier coding system. That won't be too hard to use.
Please
look this over and let me know your thoughts.
Sincerely, Alan
Falkoff, M.D., D.A.B.F.P. High Ridge Family Practice, LLC Committee
Chairman Stamford IPA Information Technology Search
Committee
|