John S. Gage wrote:
>> Julio Bonis Sanz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> There�s other not so bad software at least (Netscape Navigator?),
>>> and there�s soft that we can consider just a "baby" (I dont feel a
>>> gur� to put here an example).
>>>
>>> Could be a good idea to do a time-line and put the different Open
>>> Source softwares on it.
>>>
>> Re: Netscape navigator: I've been using Mozilla 0.9.2 for a month now
>> and it is light years ahead of Netscape 4.7x
>
>
> I downloaded Mozilla and I didn't think it was light years ahead. I
> am probably missing something. Could you elaborate on light years ahead?
>
> John
You are kidding, right? Here's just a few: e-mail client can handle multiple id's so
you don't have to switch sessions, password manager, sidebar, skinnable, fast
rendering, sophisticated programming interface, greatly improved Composer, it is
already less buggy than Netscape 4.7x, there is much more, see: http://www.mozilla.org
All this in a browser that is not 1.0 yet and best of all COMPLETELY OPEN SOURCE.
--
-- Ignacio Valdes, Editor: Linux Medical News
http://www.linuxmednews.com
'Revolutionizing Medical Education and Practice'
