On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Bart Koppers wrote:
...
> > In fact, how about an Open-Source section of one of the NHS/NHSIA
> websites,
> > with examples of what's available (from OS and Office stuff right up to
> > full-blown HIS), perhaps recommendations ("9 out of 10 doctors prefer
> > K-Office to Star Office"), and guidance/tips to get newbies started?
> >
>
> Maybe Andrew Ho is interested?Hi Bart, Yes, I am interested. As a potential user of any given software, I always try to read user recommendations. That is why user reviews is one of the major features of the OIO Library. As far as I know, LinuxMedNews also has a user-ratings feature. The EuSpirit site does not. Compared to LinuxMedNews, the OIO Library's user reviews allows more details - LinuxMedNews uses a single numeric scale. Since we activated the "Reviews" feature to the OIO Library around March 2001, there have been few reviews submitted. In particular, even the "major" open source software such as FreeMed and FreePM did not have users who are willing to submit reviews. At first, I was concerned that this is due to poor site design. But, I am doubtful that this lack of review is specific to the OIO Library. Even on FreeMed, FreePM mailing lists, and broader mailing lists such as the OpenHealth list, there is a general lack of critical review and feedback. Speaking of business models, my guess is that we are not paying people enough to endure the accusations and negative karma that result from critical comments. Unless we have users and peers who are willing to provide reviews, there won't be reviews. Best regards, Andrew --- Andrew P. Ho, M.D. OIO: Open Infrastructure for Outcomes www.TxOutcome.Org (Hosting OIO Library #1 and OSHCA Mirror #1)
