On Monday 03 June 2002 10:04 am, Ignacio Valdes wrote: MOSS > I think he's coined a very useful term. Nice phrase, were we realy short of acronyms though? I shall remember and re-use it which is probably a test of appropropriateness and originality it passes.
> >3. RedHat? > Sure. Ubiquitous, not as cutting edge, has infrastructure in place. Debian also has infrastructure in place, and looks resilient... > >4. Which three EMRs to compare? > > Difficult to say, but SQLclinic, FreePM and OSCAR come to mind. One is in UK terms secondary sector, the others primary. GNUMed is not currently in use otherwise it would b in there I think. > >5. Which criteria to compare them on? > > Architecture, performance, features, documentation, installation, > usability and cost. I would also compare it to a commercial closed > source app, especially with regard to cost. And endurance/sustainability/vendor-loss survivability. Ars Longa needs IT Longa -- From one of the Linux desktops of Dr Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/
