Thomas, Thanks for making your presentation available! I especially enjoyed the first part where you described how things would ideally work by 2010. As you know, there are many parallels between GEHR/openEHR archetypes and OIO forms. As we have begun to build "workflows" authoring and enactment tools that take advantage of OIO forms, I wonder how you envision doing the same with archetypes? I recall reading about "transactions" in the old GEHR documents. Are your "transactions" functionally equivalent to workflows? How do the "transactions" work with the archetypes? I do not see mention of "transactions" in your newest presentation. Where do you see "transactions" fitting into the new "knowledge" landscape? If you have time to look over my presentation from the recent OSHCA 2002 meeting, you can find it here: http://www.txoutcome.org/scripts/zope/readings/OIO_talk/slides/oshca2002workshop
If you are in a hurry, you can jump directly to the slide on the new user-definale workflows, here: http://www.txoutcome.org/scripts/zope/readings/OIO_talk/slides/oshca2002workshop/definable%20workflow I look forward to your comments! Best regards, Andrew --- Andrew P. Ho, M.D. OIO: Open Infrastructure for Outcomes www.TxOutcome.Org (Hosting OIO Library #1 and OSHCA Mirror #1)
