On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Thomas Beale wrote:
...
> there are projects already happening - one under consideration is an
> Australian government funded one which could lead to a national EHR
> infrastructure

Thomas,
  Would you tell us more about this Australian government-funded project?
In particular, is it going to be free? When is it expected to go to
production?

> - so I don't think nothing at all will happen, but overall I agree - the
> OS community is very important. The timetable (see
> http://www.openehr.org/active.htm) is this: we want to get a 0.9 release
> out the door in the next 8 weeks.

Is the 0.9 version of openEHR adequate for ensuring portable medical
records?

Is the Australian government-funded implementation (that you mentioned
above) based on openEHR 0.9?

> I am presently in Europe to push this along. The 0.9 release will be
> solid enough for widespread implementation

What do you mean by "solid enough"?

I think the most important feature is whether 0.9 is sufficient to ensure
portability. Whether or not it is sufficiently descriptive is another
question - which is not as critical - as long as you can help us
understand what the limitations are.

...
> Another thing which has to be done is that the DSTC will (I hope!)
> contribute an XML implementation spec to help people use openEHR in XML,
> schema etc.

DSTC makes proprietary, Windows-based, buggy :-) versions of openEHR
archetype editor etc. Why should we count on them to give us a stable,
XML-based openEHR interface?

Has DSTC changed their business model recently?

...
> >>to prevent corporations from using the vendor-lock-in strategy to
> >>segment the market.
> >
> >Yes, that is sure to happen. Even before any standard is finalized,
> >proprietary "enhancements" are typically planned or even ready-to-ship.
> >
> the way to do this is with pay-for compliance - you pay a bit and some
> testing is done on the product, then you get the right to use the
> "openEHR 1.0-compliant" sticker...

Do you plan to offer free testing and certification for free software
products?

...
> writing code right now. If you are interested in doing this, I suggest
> the openEHR demographic model is a god place to start experimenting.

ok, thanks!

Best regards,

Andrew
---
Andrew P. Ho, M.D.
OIO: Open Infrastructure for Outcomes
www.TxOutcome.Org

Reply via email to