On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Tim Churches wrote: ... > What I wrote was as follows: > > "Pommerening et al. [20] described a technique for improving privacy and ... > Ho subsequently described and obtained a United States patent for a ...
Tim, Immediately following this "Related work" section you wrote: "Distinguishing features of the system The system proposed in this paper differs from those mentioned above in a number of important ways." Again, your list of "Distinguishing features" have been refuted, point-by-point, back in March 2003: http://www.euspirit.org/pipermail/picnic/2003-March/000013.html It appears that your paper first mis-characterized SDSS and then presented your proposed design as different from SDSS, using these so-called "Distinguishing features". ... > If that is a mischaracterisation of your work, then I am sorry. If your apology is sincere, then I do accept it. It is not too late to correct the error. ... > That is the correct way to handle these issues. I am still waiting. Best regards, Andrew --- Andrew P. Ho, M.D. Assistant Clinical Professor, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Department of Psychiatry University of California, Los Angeles [This message contains quotes from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/1 which is Copyrighted 2003 Churches; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.]
