John, That is an excellent suggestion especially since this provides a public forum for open source solutions. Also it wouldn't take much effort to put together a comparative matrix.
Cheers, Joseph On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 02:08, John Norris wrote: > Would the various traits outlined in "Functional Requirements for EMR > Systems" put out by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services be > a good way to compare? > > There are several vendors who have submitted their information, but they > are not compiled into a matrix. > > http://bphc.hrsa.gov/chc/emrspecs.asp > > (OpenOffice easily handled the Word formatted checklist and directions > document...) > > John Norris > (http://john-norris.net) > > > > Ignacio Valdes wrote: > > Interesting site that I've never heard of before. Thanks for the link. > Unless I am missing something, I note that there appears to be no FOSS > EMR's on the site. Could the usual suspect projects infect the site? > Yes, I know I'm supposed to be camping. I haven't left yet. > -- IV > > On 06 Jan 2004 06:32:40 -0800 > Tim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 09:26, Kevin Coonan MD wrote: > > While not an independent study, you may find this comparison matrix > > helpful. > > http://www.elmr-electronic-medical-records-emr.com/ > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Tim Cook (President, Open Paradigms,LLC) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Public Key - 1024D/9ACDB673 available from: > > http://www.openparadigms.com/timcook_publickey.asc > > Key fingerprint = C7BB 675B BDCA B87D 83F0 A002 BBDC C7B8 9ACD B673 > > > >
