Andrew Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Tim Churches wrote: > ... > > Horst Herb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11, Tim Churches wrote: > > Thomas, Horst and Tim, > So, just to clarify. > I gather that none you know of any specific plan to publish the > Australian implementation of OpenEHR under an open source license?
Thomas is in a better position to answer this than Horst or I, since AFAIK we don't have any direct involvement in the OpenEHR implementation work (I certainly don't, I doubt that Horst does). But I gather from Thomas' previous answer that the question of open sourcing is up to the contracting agency who is paying for the work. Of course, they can always be lobbied. But I don't know who they are (although I can probably guess). Tim C
