-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tim Cook wrote:

|
| If this is true....what method(s) are the GP's using to prevent exposing
| private patient data to modification and/or interception by third
| parties?
|
What I find more interesting is the data, or more precisely, the lack of
it, that supports technology to prevent modification and/or interception
by third parties.

We take it as a fundamental assumption that because it's technologically
doable (the compromise of data), it must be prevented.  Some countries
even write regulations and laws about it.

But there are many things in this world that have adverse consequences
as a result of technology.  What made this one reach such an exalted
state of concern?

Actually, it's the latter question that really interests me, because
when I started to investigate what the magnitude of the problem was, I
discovered the lack of evidence.

There is certainly the fundamental risk equation which balances costs of
implementation against potential costs of compromise.  One argument goes
that if the implementation cost is extremely low, we need not calculate
the potential compromise cost.  I think that is true for SSL on the Web,
at least when it comes to the cost of labor for implementation, which is
extremely low. The impact on transaction costs is another thing, but
once again, that is rarely calculated.......

My current favorite theory to explain why we elevate some consequences
into standard practice, in the absence of evidence, is a combination of
the following social phenomena mixed with low labor costs of implementation:

Fear of the 'bad guy', i.e. the bogeyman will get ya.

Technological imperative, i.e. more technology is better then less
technology.

What I ultimately would like to understand, and use this security case
as nothing more than an example (i.e., it's not special in and of
itself), is how those two social phenomena are driving the informational
transformation of medicine.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA0DssY+HG7UEwVGERAmk6AJwNrJNsaBWBl2fzqEzGwX1PYaLYGQCfXXbB
D2cg5FUOeA4KIJQ2IjlzQ7k=
=ZsuS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply via email to