On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Daniel L. Johnson wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 20:29, Tim Churches wrote:
> > There is some concern here in Australia over a patent application lodged
> > by the Pharmacy Guild of Australia over some rather generic features of
> > EHRs.
>
> More prior art...
>
> Dr. Thomas Payne used WAN technology to distribute his own EHR between
> his clinic, hospital, and local nursing home in 1990, using a DOS-based
> system.
>
> And, of course, there's the Logician Internet software that maintained a
> central data repository and served practices over the net, circa
> 1996-98.

Dan,
  But do these prior systems provide the follwing set of functions?

"comprising the steps of : the consumer causing personal health data to be
stored in a secure repository, said repository requiring authentication of
the consumer's identity before the consumer is provided access to the
repository; the consumer selecting items of personal health data to share
and identifying a health care provider, or class of health care providers,
to whom access will be provided for those items of personal health data;
a health care provider providing authentication of their identity to the
consumer's secure repository and being provided access to those items of
personal health data of the consumer for which the health care provider
has been identified for sharing; the health care provider using the
personal health data of the consumer to determine health care advice or
the provision of a health care service for the consumer; and the health
care provider recording details of the consultation and the advice or
service provided to the consumer in the secure repository of health data
of the consumer."
Quoted from Claim 1 of
http://v3.espacenet.com/textclam?CY=ep&LG=en&F=4&IDX=WO02073456&DB=EPODOC&QPN=WO02073456

Prior art that do not "read on" the claims of the patent are not relevant
to this discusssion. Specifically, subset implementation does not
infringe a patent. This means if we build software that does not do all
the steps spelled out above, it does not infringe.

Best regards,

Andrew
---
Andrew P. Ho, M.D.
OIO: Open Infrastructure for Outcomes
www.TxOutcome.Org

Reply via email to