The OMG never finalized a spec, but did a lot of "spade" work. This
work continues and extends as a joint HL7 and OMG work. People are
invited to join this effort to come up with a robust RLS specification.
As long as some folks from the CFH linking subcommittee is involved, it
should be fine. But the CFH is not a standards body. Other specs are
under consideration by this group also. The group can be viewed on
yahoogroups as servicesspec, I believe. If we have a lot of diverse
groups doing this we will fail the community in not providing
interoperability as required by the NHIN.
Dave
Will Ross wrote:
Dave,
Correct, the Linking document I referenced from CFH only lays out the
case for the RLS. Actual specs are still in discussion. I'm not
currently a party to that discussion, which is taking place at the
monthly meetings of the CFH Linking Subcommittee. As far as I know HL7
has folks in the discussion, but I can't tell you if the OMG spec is
on the table or not.
[wr]
- - - - - - - -
begin:vcard
fn:David Forslund
n:Forslund;David
org:Los Alamos National Laboratory;CCS-DO
adr;dom:;;MS B265;Los Alamos;NM;87545
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Laboratory Fellow
tel;work:505-665-2633
version:2.1
end:vcard
