Wayne Wilson wrote:
> Finally if software is developed with unit test capabilities, it is
> quite easy to repeat unit tests upon software modification, so this does
> not become much of a burden either.
Indeed. My approach these days when considering open source software
components for serious use is to look for the unit tests (and for
functional and integration tests too). If there are no unit tests, it
indicates that the code was written on a wing-and-a-prayer basis and is
best avoided.
Tim C
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
