hi

 

I successfully configured openhpi to support one domain for each machine(or 
more exactly each handler), just some silly mistakes:-)

however, if I have one handler for a non-existent machine, openhpi doesnt work 
correctly. it will report “wrong version” for discover command once, but works 
fine the next time, and then report error again.

this happens in both 2.10.2 and 2.11.0, no matter wether I configure domain in 
openhpi.conf or not.

 

 

the following is the output of the error message from hpitop:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# hpitop -x

hpitop (rev 6571) - This program came with OpenHPI 2.11.0

SAF HPI Version B.02.01

 

saHpiSessionOpen

saHpiSessionOpen returns with SessionId 1

saHpiDiscover

Wrong version? 0x50 != 0x1

saHpiDiscover returns NO_RESPONSE

 

 

the openhpid.conf below:

handler libipmi {                                                               
 <========this is the right handler

        entity_root = "{SYSTEM_CHASSIS,200}"

        name = "lan"

        addr = "10.10.37.190"

        port = "623"

        auth_type = "md5"

        auth_level= "admin"

        username = "root"

        password = "111111"

}

handler libipmi {                                                               
 <========this is the handler for a non-existent machine

        entity_root = "{SYSTEM_CHASSIS,201}"

        name = "lan"

        addr = "10.10.37.191"

        port = "623"

        auth_type = "md5"

        auth_level= "admin"

        username = "root"

        password = "111111"

}

 

 

  _____  

发件人: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 代表 Peter D Phan
发送时间: 2008年4月8日 0:27
收件人: [email protected]
主题: Re: [Openhpi-devel] what is the current status of openhpi?

 

> I am trying openhpi for machine management, and have several questions:
> 1. is openhpi designed for managing large scale of machine, for 
> example writing hundreds of handlers in openhpid.conf. has anyone 
> done such tests, or used it in that way? I care about the stability 
> and performance. 

We have tested at max 20 handlers at once; mostly we have tested in the 10's 
using plugins snmp_bc, ipmc, and ipmidirect.
WE have never attempted 100s.


Regards,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P. D. Phan
IBM Austin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inactive hide details for Renier Morales---04/07/2008 11:10:40 [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote on 04/07/Renier Morales---04/07/2008 11:10:40 [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote on 04/07/2008 08:11:28 AM:


Renier Morales/Poughkeepsie/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

04/07/2008 11:10 AM 


Please respond to
[email protected]




To


[EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]




cc






Subject


Re: [Openhpi-devel] what is the current status of openhpi?

 








[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/07/2008 08:11:28 AM:

> I am trying openhpi for machine management, and have several questions:
> 1. is openhpi designed for managing large scale of machine, for 
> example writing hundreds of handlers in openhpid.conf. has anyone 
> done such tests, or used it in that way? I care about the stability 
> and performance. 

No, to my knowledge, nobody has tested OpenHPI with hundreds of handlers. It 
would be good to have someone attempt it and report back. 

> 2. the openhpi.conf.example from the source code says that you can 
> organize resources, actually I mean machines, to a specific domain, 
> I tried and it seems doesn’t work. does openhpi really support 
> multiple domain, or it was just my mistake? 

Yes, it supports multiple domains. You would have to show your openhpi.conf to 
comment more. 

> 3. polling seems to be the only way to access events, does openhpi 
> support asynchronous callback? or in consideration? 

Polling is the only way to available through the HPI API currently. There is 
discussion in the SAF about providing an asynchrounous mechanism, but nothing 
definite yet. 

       --Renier 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

<<image001.gif>>

<<image004.gif>>

<<image005.gif>>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to