Shuah Khan píše v St 23. 04. 2008 v 08:55 -0600:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Could you please elaborate on licensing and certification reasons for
> standardizing on NSS. One of the reasons we picked OpenSSL is that it is
> bundled in all of the distributions OpenHPI is currently supported on.
> One thing to consider when choosing NSS over OpenSSL for OpenHPI is
> NSS's availability on different distributions.
>
First, there is nothing wrong with OpenSSL, but in the opinion of our
security team, NSS has some important advantages. For the full details,
please read the texts from the included links in my initial mail. [3]
contains details about compatibility of various licenses with Fedora and
GPL. About the availability - where is Firefox, there is NSS :-).
Dan
> >
> > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
> > [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationEval
[3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
--
Dan Horák
Software Engineer, BaseOS
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
