Shuah,
cIpmiMc object do not represent AMC Module.
So the proposed code block will be never executed at all.
Anton Pak
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:58:15 +0300, Shuah Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 18:02 +0000, Khan, Shuah wrote:
>> Pierre,
>>
>> Yes. I misstated when I said it doesn't handle 5.0. What I meant to say
>> is that the plug-in doesn't have the case for AMC modules. Is it okay to
>> have the plug-in talk to AMC based on the site address communicated to
>> it by the Carrier IPMC. The case I am dealing with is the IPMC on the
>> AMC carrier bridges traffic and communicates AMC module site addresses
>> as defined in 3.13.1.
>>
>> So the question is is it okay to add AMC case to cIpmiMc::CheckTca()?
>>
>> Sorry if I am not following what you are saying?
>
> Pierre, Anton,
>
> This is a good discussion, however I am not clear if there are any
> problems adding this enhancement or not. Could you please let me know.
>
> -- Shuah
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
