On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 20:30 +0000, Bishop, Michael (ISB Linux/Telco)
wrote:

> Comments are welcome.

Well...you asked...

In the past, the project has tried to pay attention to code format.
(Ref http://openhpi.org/Developers, Coding Style at the bottom)  Though
it's not spelled out explicitly, the format implies trying to keep the
source code such that it can be maintained in 80-column terminal
windows.  My personal preference is to stick to this style, rather than
allowing lines to become so long as to require unusual-sized editing
windows.  Doing so allows me to keep a number of open terminal windows
on my screen, and I lose this if my windows have to be wider.  It's also
frustrating to have to re-size windows all the time just because the
last person to edit a particular file used a different width editor.
Therefore, I'd recommend reformatting the longer lines of this patch to
be <= 80 characters per line.

I recognize that not all of the project code has held to this guideline.
Also, if others feel that this is an outmoded suggestion, please speak
up.  We don't have to stick with ideas that have outlived their
usefulness.

Bryan


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to